Reds 24 – Japan 17
I have to say from the start that I was surprised with the intensity of this match. The Reds fronted with essentially a Super 14 starting side minus their internationals, and the feeling amongst the crowd was that this would be a bit of a jaunt.
How wrong they were. The Japanese were full on, defensively very staunch and the game was only won by the Reds in the last 10 minutes. The ground was a bit dewy and it was cold…well, not as cold as ‘John Coat’ in Canberra mind. The game was played under international ELV rules – which meant it was a tad stilted but you got used to it after a while. It was great to be back in the bosom of Queensland rugby, albeit with a small crowd and not that much atmosphere.
The Japanese entered this game with a quintet of kimono’d kiwis in their ranks and they led the charge. In particular, their loose forwards Leitch and O’Reilly. Combining with No 8 and captain, Kikutani, they turned over Reds possession about 8 or 9 times at the ruck. Not only turnover ball, but vigorous counter rucking as well.
Their set piece was fairly solid – an area you’d expect we’d dominate? Lineouts were evenly matched, they even had some tall timber….I thought Japanese were small? And their scrum started in one piece but deteriorated a bit later in the game courtesy of Weekes and Daley. In fact, there was hardly a scrum that didn’t collapse and with resets and a plethora of scrum penalties, dragged it out a bit.
The Reds scored first with a try to new No. 10 Dallan Murphy, who certainly looked a bit of a talent, being able to control the game with effective decision making (+ great pass + pace). That was helped by having Lucas inside him who provided a fairly slick service. Japan struck back just prior to halftime, after an early penalty goal, with a converted try to Onozawa.
In the second half the Reds slowly gained some ascendancy with tries late in the match to Higgo, Fetoai and substitute Dom Shipperley – an ‘in and away’ that bamboozled the defence. Japan also scored another converted try in the meantime, with the game finishing after some enterprising attack on their behalf.
The Reds forwards played OK as a unit with the corpulent kiwi Leroy ‘Houston we have a problem’ a bit of a standout. And that problem is, like Andy Powell from Wales, he’s very readable and is becoming a ‘one trick pony’. The tight five did the business and Luafutu’s one-off running worked a treat.
Fetoai was a bit of a handful for the Japanese defence but no-one else really stood out. I did like the look of replacement centre Albert Vuli Vuli…another ‘Volcano’ methinks, although he has Lote’s hair and build, but runs faster…..
The Japanese defensive effort exceeded all expectations with Suntory Sungoliath (and former Highlander) Ryan Nicholas outstanding. Halfback Tanaka was….um….tenacious. Their five eighth’s, Shaun Webb (another from the House of Pain) in the first half and long term Japanese squad member James Arlidge controlled their backline ably.
And finally, the highlight of the evening was the ground announcer reading out the team names over the tannoy. You’d expect him to have a bit of trouble with the Japanese side…and he did. But you would think that he’d know how to pronounce the Reds players names….wouldn’t you? Perhaps this is indicative of what’s happening at this franchise…he fuckin’ didn’t!
<span class="dsq-postid" data-dsqidentifier="3493 https://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/?p=3493">15 Comments
Thanks Lance,
If only the Reds could play Japan every week….
Juan – I’m not sure the Cherry Blossoms would actually lose if they played Queensland again next week?
I’d beg to differ that it was a S14 side: the forwards yes, but the backs would not be first choice S14 starters, apart from Lucas.
Hopefully the Japanese had a good hitout for the Pac nations cup, and the Reds had a good run.
I’ve seen VuliVuli playing 13 for Souths, and he looks a pretty good outside back, if the Reds had a spare slot.
“The Reds fronted with essentially a Super 14 starting side minus their internationals,” is what he said. That’s fairly accurate.
the team was:
Mark McLinden
Brando Va’aulu
Charlie Fetoai
Anthony Faingaa
Anthony Sauer
Dallan Murphy
Ben Lucas
So Mac, Va’aulu and Lucas were all S14 starters. Fetoai was on occassions but was effectively there for Wallaby Ione, Fainga for Wallaby Barnes, Murphy for Wallaby Cooper and Sauer for Wallaby Hynes.
Remembering we didn’t have Toua (injured), Davies and Tapai (20s) as well.
So the statement is fair I reckon.
Apart from newby Dallan Murphy at 10 (as mentioned in the post), every player in the starting side has played Super 14 this year.
Suprisingly the Japs are strong in set piece. Played against Toyota and NEC squads where they put a lot of time into ensuring set piece is strong. Dont let size fool you, they are technically very capable, strong, and arent afraid to give you a headbutt (i got my nose broken against Toyota HA!)
Their size in the front row gives them some leverage when it comes to body height in engagement….but you are right….they do tire after a while….
as for lineouts…as much as the numbers rules were in palce in 03 adn 04, they have tremendous ground speed….
i guess thats the overall desicption, they are quite quick with everything they do, and that can cacth you off guard fro 20-40 at least…
remmeber Lance…..the Nest….12:30….saturday
Sorry El Dommo – schoolboy refereeing commitment.
PS Hami broke his leg last Saturday…. out for the season!
i was at the game, although it was a pretty tiny crowd, i couldnt stop thinking how good it would be if the reds moved back to old ballymore. the place has just got an eerie feel about it with all the tradition… redeveloped or not, i think Queensland Rugby would be a lot better if we moved back ‘home’. a crowd of 15,000 at lang park feels as though it is 3,000 at ballymore and a crowd of 15,000 at ballymore has an awesome awesome atmosphere.. am i the only other person who thinks this?
Woody – my understanding is that (and Juan or El Dommo may know more about that than me), but the QRU lose substantive amounts of money at Suncorp due to the crowd sizes being nowhere near the original ‘optimistic’ estimates. I gather that they’re locked into this contract for some time.
I agree entirely with you – I’d love to see a return to Ballymore. You can see that it’s starting to deteriorate a bit without that TLC. I’d like us to return to the situation of a few years ago, where we played a few marquee matches (that are likely to draw a substantive crowd) at Suncorp, but the remainder at Ballymore. There’s just a warm familiarity and connection to the place…..
When I read that amazing “Suncorp black hole” claim printed elsewhere I went online and checked the QRU’s P&L accounts, which actually show:
2008 Gate takings for Reds games $2.398m
2008 Match Day Costs – Suncorp $1.626m
So if there’s some secret loss making deal between Suncorp and the QRU it’s been well hidden from the auditors. Or it could be just an urban myth.
You’re probably right Curious…you’ll notice that I qualified it! That’s the beauty of being a sideline commentator…you don’t necessarily have to be in possession of all the facts?
They might make a profit on gate sales v stadium costs, but is it what they had originally projected? I guess the QRU would have to be disappointed with the way it’s gone at Suncorp – small crowds, no atmosphere and in possession of a perfectly good but empty stadium that must cost them a packet to upkeep – I’m assuming those figures would be available as well? Notwithstanding having to write down its asset value, they’re not actually flush with money these days, otherwise Gits and others would be coming here….
What do you think the solution is – should we go back to Ballymore?
Yes for sure. Head back to Ballymore and it would be saving the QRU a lot of money (even though they would surely lose QR’s sponsorship) and it would help the Reds. Lang Park is an awesome stadium however it just isn’t needed for the Reds. Capacity crowd at Ballymore will surely urge the Reds on as it actually has the “Home” ground advantage. Lang Park is just too generic. Also, I think it from a Ballymore perspective, voting Kevin Rudd into power was the worst possible thing, but that redevelopment is another issue.
If the games were going to be played at Ballymore on Sunday afternoons like they used to, then go for it. Plenty of time to get there, have a few bevvies and then think about leaving two hours after the game ended. But when they switched to night games for TV it wasn’t nearly as appealing, big last minute crush at the gates (don’t even think about getting there from work on Friday night) and getting hustled out soon after fulltime to join the queue at the cab rank. Sure Lang Park looks empty now, but at least it can handle the crowds the Reds WILL get when the tide turns (starry eyed, I know, but you gotta believe!). From what I’ve seen of the proposed development, it will help the old joint generate cash rather than soak it up in maintenance. I can’t see the neighbours who are opposed to the redevelopment offering to mow the lawns of “their” park for free..
Good point about Sundays. Hopefully some form of development will go ahead. As for Lang Park….one for the true believers!!!!
“That was helped by having Lucas inside him who provided a fairly slick service.”
still talking about rugby??
… sorry … couldn’t help myself…