T
Train Without a Station
Guest
Well let's find out if that's true at test level hey?
I'm a Jones fan but it's a lot to ask of him defensively to play 8.Trains on to it.
What about Jones at 8? Hits up well and is atheletic and a lineout jumper
Trains on to it.
What about Jones at 8? Hits up well and is atheletic and a lineout jumper
agree with the fundamental principle you are getting across but would it not be the case that some guys could quite easily fill the role and do the job well even though they are not the lineout general at their franchise??? I would think that sometimes the reason that they are not running the lineout could be due to incumbency at their clubs (retaining the lineout general who has been there before)
So Simmons is a walk up starter then?Well let's find out if that's true at test level hey?
So Simmons is a walk up starter then?
Does anyone know if the test players are sitting out Round 16 on the 30th and 31st of May?
According to the stats, Higginbotham and Fardy are the two most penalised players in Super Rugby this year.
Im not ridiculously anti Simmons (was prior to EOYT) but he does give away some shit penalties. My point is that im sure in the past at an elite level a player has left the test arena as a lineout general and been replace by someone who hadnt been previously. Whose not to say that all in contention hadnt spent the previous ten years of their life calling line outs. Dont think there are to many Tom Bowman eske players getting around these days
More referring to the cards again argentina and scotland in test matches for dumb shit. Think leaving your side one tight forward short with the game in the balance is pretty dumbYes they have, but has the line out contributed to flourish after this?
He is still one of the best line out operators in Australia (as a jumper and leader), if not the best. That's one of a locks core duties so you cannot just ignore this when judging his form.
Also, for the record probably 50% of Simmons penalties are conceded contesting the line out. I just find the double standard intriguing that Fardy giving away penalties going hard at the breakdown is ok, but Simmons at the line out is not. They're both doing it fighting for possession. It's just one is more liked than the other so he is accepted for it.
For the record I like fardy's style of play and think it's worth it, I'm just pointing out the double standard
Horwill has called the lineout on several occasions.If we omit Simmons, for Jones with Mowen likely not playing we basically concede any chance of a dominant line out.
Horwill has called the lineout on several occasions.
Trains on to it.
What about Jones at 8? Hits up well and is atheletic and a lineout jumper
I like Jones at 6 as well.Playing 8 in the Shute Shield is a pretty different issue to playing 8 in Tests. It's not a good move, even before you take into account that he's played all season at lock. I personally think he's best suited to 6, has the prototypical size for the position at Test level, but since he's been the best lock in Australia all year he should be given a run there to see if he's up to it. I think he'll be good at lock, then will lock down the 6 spot once Fardy retires/moves overseas.
Yeah absolutely, it's a good problem to have. He definitely deserves a starting spot against the French, and given he's been playing so well at lock I reckon they should put him there.I like Jones at 6 as well.
Jones has almost demanded selection as well - but he's played lock doing that.
Then there is Fardy who hasn't lost his position.