AngrySeahorse
Peter Sullivan (51)
Bugger, some great play there by Namibia.
EDIT: Namibia may have gone over at the end!
EDIT: And its good!
EDIT: Namibia may have gone over at the end!
EDIT: And its good!
Danie van Wyk was the stand out for Namibia. Amatuer player. Works in a brewery. Has plenty of pace.
Danie van Wyk was the stand out for Namibia. Amatuer player. Works in a brewery. Has plenty of pace.
please please please one time Fiji beat SA then giving them a sudden death game against Samoa.. that would be aws. k thx bai.
Don't forget that Australia might be playing the second placed team in this pool. I'm kind of hoping it's Wales.
Frank Bunce, Pat Lam attack IRB over unfair scheduling
by Manu Samoa on Friday, September 16, 2011 at 6:18am
MARC HINTON IN AUCKLAND
Sept., 16, 2011
The IRB is coming under fire for the short turnarounds being inflicted on unfashionable tier-two countries who have proven star attractions through the opening week of the Rugby World Cup.
Teams such as Samoa, Canada, Namibia, Georgia and the USA all had just three days between their opening games and their second pool matches this week.
However, New Zealand had their first two games scheduled a week apart, England had a luxurious eight days (allowing them to get on the ran-tan in Queenstown) between games and Australia and South Africa six days.
Many believe that's unfair on countries who are struggling to bridge the gap between the haves and have-nots of rugby and who have the odds stacked against them anyway.
Former Samoa greats Frank Bunce and Pat Lam, both of whom went on to play for the All Blacks, believe the IRB have got the formula completely wrong.
They reckon tier-two countries who lack the financial and playing resources of the major rugby nations should be the ones afforded the lengthier break between games and say the heavyweights are well equipped to handle a short turnaround through the pool stages.
"It's unfair," said Bunce who played for Samoa at the 1991 World Cup and then went on to have a 55-test career with the All Blacks. "They're the least-equipped teams to have the short turnarounds.
"We saw last weekend the so-called lesser teams stood up and they certainly all went down fighting. But we've seen at World Cup after World Cup they start well, but tend to drop off because you can't keep that intensity up when you have to play again so soon."
Lam says the solution is simple, and he offers another recommendation around the developing nations.
"In the professional game with the resources and depth of the top nations, it's those teams that should have the shorter turnarounds," said Lam.
"It only takes the tier-two nations to lose two or three players and that's a major catastrophe because their depth isn't as strong. Having that full turnaround will make them even more competitive."
Lam also wants to see a plate or shield competition that would give the tier-two nations something to aspire to beyond the pool stage. His proposal is for the last-placed teams to go home and the third and fourth finishers to enter a second-tier knockout competition.
"Imagine instead of a third-place playoff that teams don't even want to play, the day before the final there's a shield final that could be Georgia or Romania against Fiji or Tonga. What a great competition and more rugby at this level for those nations."
Rumblings have already started among the so-called lesser nations.
"It makes me laugh," said Canada's Kiwi coach Kieran Crowley after his team's opening upset over Tonga on Wednesday night. They now play France on Sunday.
Tongan coach Isitolo Maka attributed Wednesday night's defeat, and the record 11 personnel changes made, to the demands of two games within a week. "The only reason we had to make the changes was the four-day turnaround, but now we've got a week to prepare, so it's going to be different facing Japan."
The IRB's hands are tied by the realities of the prescribed time frame. Their TV partners, who pay serious money for rights, also make it clear they prefer the heavyweight clashes in the weekend slots.
"This is the best-balanced schedule to date for a Rugby World Cup," said a spokesman. "While it is unavoidable that some teams have a more compressed schedule than others, we have worked to ensure no team has two three-day periods in a row, as well as minimising travel. There are five teams that have 14 rest days or less, down from seven in 2007 and eight in 2003."
The spokesman added broadcast revenues were reinvested into the tier-two nations. "We are investing over £150 million in that regard between 2009-2012 as a result of the commercial success of RWC." - Stuff