RH - the only issue I have with your argument is that the same arguments were made about Giteau and since he signed the mega deal with the ARU his game has been in steady decline to the point where most of us agree he is a stretch to make the 22 on merit. The biggest difference is that Cooper has proved less in Rugby than Giteau did prior to that mega deal. IMO any huge sums thrown at Cooper also devalues the deals of the hard grafters in the pigs who the success or loss can be based upon. Players like TPN (who does so much more for Rugby at all levels than QC (Quade Cooper) has ever done), Robinson, Alexander and Pocock. Without them Cooper would have no chance to shine in Rugby. Do not throw the baby out so to speak just to keep another one happy.
Points taken. But it's a stretch to argue IMO that the large payments in and of themselves created G's downwards performance spiral per se. And what seems to have happened with Giteau is that this high payment level has gone on and on and on for many years, and not adjusted downwards against any form of KPI whatsoever.
I would never advocate QC (Quade Cooper) or any other was given a contract at the higher levels I mentioned for, say, more than 2 years, or longer if essential but then with full KPI adjustment rights (in favour of the ARU) after the first fixed 2 years were completed. The other issue with Giteau is that the high salary should not in any circumstances force his selection when he's been playing poorly - half the problem is that RD/ARU has not had the selection courage to drop or bench him for a while or force him to have time away from the game for a period of deeper renewal (if such was possible).
I do definitely take your point re intra-team relativities, but unfortunately in sport today there are always going to emerge some dazzlers who stand out and pull fans, big time. They're going to tend to be backs in rugby. (In fact, if I could invert this point, I'm rather glad we have some in this class, as with none I would fear even more for the code.) And today the dazzlers going to be code-mobile and country-mobile and they're going to have smart agents who will find ways to get their market price established. It's harsh sports capitalism 2010-version I know, but sports owners are going to fear the loss of the crowd and media pulling dazzlers and high-performers, more than a 'middle class' forward.