Not most Brumbies fans it's most fans. We need to take the best players from all teams to make a competitive side. Winning teams who lost only 3 times vs a team who won twice, I know which team I'd be pulling more players from. Both the Reds and Brumbies should make up the majority of the Wallabies.. common fucking sense really no?
On face value, I guess so, and I expect those teams to have large representation. Plenty of good ones in both teams, although they double up in a few positions so some good ones will miss out.
But as long as I have been following Aus rugby, it's never that simple.
Schmidt will have ideas about combos and how he wants the team to play, and aside from the Brumbies and Reds the other teams have all had some good players.
Also, looking at how a team went can be flawed. If, say, the Brumbies and Reds lost 8-9 front rowers, would they have finished as well on the table? Probably not. If the Rebels had not played under the shadow of being culled, maybe they might have done better.
There are a few positions for the Wallabies where I can't say with a lot of confidence that there is a standout candidate. That's my biggest concern.