• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

What is wrong with the Tahs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Inside Shoulder

Nathan Sharpe (72)
Just to point something out.

My points before Slim decided I was saying the brumbies win was tarnished,

*forwards are performing well
*backs are terrible
*coaching us to blame
*injuries have affected combinations
*injuries have affected form
*changing of positions between plays have affected the two above.

So in response
Brumbies fans believe
*injuries don't matter
*if a side has more wallabies than another they should be favorites
*that NSW is a talent drain
*that NSW fail to develop players

If slim or anyone would care to sign off on the statements that are correct or change the wording etc, I would love to have a clear baseline at which to judge every team in the comp.

Why do the tahs always have so many injuries?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Ghibli

Ted Thorn (20)
As Redshappy suggested, here is the debate from last year. You will note the similarities in argument and posters suggesting same excuses from last year.

http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/community/threads/the-ongoing-tragedy-of-the-waratahs.7765/

Thanks. Great post. Could've been written yesterday.
Sadly for Tahs supporters, no much has changed.

So in response
Brumbies fans believe
*injuries don't matter
*if a side has more wallabies than another they should be favorites
*that NSW is a talent drain
*that NSW fail to develop players

Generalising does not help.
 

Slim 293

Stirling Mortlock (74)

rugbysmartarse

Alan Cameron (40)
Having listened to the opinions of this living outside of NSW (and some within) I offer this missing link: what, precisely, do you expect the tahs fans to do? It's not like I can run for the nswru board, or try to get a coaching job there. My options are limited to either support the team, or not support the team. Everything outside these options falls to a hope that someone else will fix the issue. I applaud all those who do the former, for any team, and continue to support a team even when they are down.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
The Sydney Uni thing is interesting. For the Tahs it is deemed an issue, for other sides, it isn't ( they all have a Uni contingent)

Watching the Rebels with their "Uni coach" and "Uni players" I saw width, hitting the ball at pace and defensive passion

With the Tahs, it is Style of play, lack of width, lack of speed to action, lack of urgency, lack of defensive effort, lack of effort off the ball - "Uni" nah
 

Richo

John Thornett (49)
The Sydney Uni thing is interesting. For the Tahs it is deemed an issue, for other sides, it isn't ( they all have a Uni contingent)

Style of play, lack of width, lack of speed to action, lack of urgency, lack of defensive effort, lack of effort off the ball - maybe

Watching the Rebels with their "Uni coach" and "Uni players" I saw width, hitting the ball at pace and defensive passion

Not to mention that Uni plays with a fair bit of passion and skill. (Not that I'm a fan -- I went to UNSW). It is an interesting question though. It seems to me that there is a stark difference between translating skills and physicality and imitating the game plan. Size and fitness simply aren't enough at the Super level. You need skill, execution and sustained performance.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Not to mention that Uni plays with a fair bit of passion and skill. (Not that I'm a fan -- I went to UNSW). It is an interesting question though. It seems to me that there is a stark difference between translating skills and physicality and imitating the game plan. Size and fitness simply aren't enough at the Super level. You need skill, execution and sustained performance.

I am wondering why the Tahs were so concerned about keeping the ball in the close, the widest it got on Friday was a cut out to Horne, the rest was inside ball/short balls through the 10-12 channel. Was it a concious decision to target Steyn? or a concern about the mobility of the pack to support a wider game?
 

Richo

John Thornett (49)
I am wondering why the Tahs were so concerned about keeping the ball in the close, the widest it got on Friday was a cut out to Horne, the rest was inside ball/short balls through the 10-12 channel. Was it a concious decision to target Steyn? or a concern about the mobility of the pack to support a wider game?

Yes, it seemed an odd decision. Both Paka and Kingston have a lot of pace and looked good when they did see the ball. I think early they were targeting Morne -- one Palu run was particularly memorable -- but the game plan seemed more conservative than it needed to be. Perhaps the early success of the Horne try encouraged them to keep the ball in the middle of the field?
 

mjw

Larry Dwyer (12)
I don't think I hear this much whinging about any other Super Rugby team regardless of their position on the ladder.
 

waratahjesus

Greg Davis (50)
Generalising does not help.

If taken those things almost from quotes from posts of a couple of brumbies fans. I asked or offered that people could change the wording if I misrepresented there arguments.

I would like you to do so, I would like 5-10 points on what constitutes something that a team can be judged on and what affects a team. I find it absolutely mind blowing that a team that has lost 12 out of it's 30 man squad to injury or suspension at some point is unaffected by it. I would like to know the criteria that all teams are judged on so it can be applied tp all teams. It's not a generalization, it's a very broad and open question that I would love your honest opinion on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjw

Bruce Ross

Ken Catchpole (46)
Not to mention that Uni plays with a fair bit of passion and skill. (Not that I'm a fan -- I went to UNSW). It is an interesting question though. It seems to me that there is a stark difference between translating skills and physicality and imitating the game plan. Size and fitness simply aren't enough at the Super level. You need skill, execution and sustained performance.

In talking about Sydney Uni-developed players at the Waratahs, one thing that is completely unrecognised is the diametrically opposed systems of physical training at the two locations. Uni players from Colts onward do very heavy strength training year-round, including crucially right throughout the playing season, and make extensive use of specialised apparatus. The Waratahs' S & Cs totally reject this approach. Uni teams are renowned for their dominance towards the end of matches; I can't recall the Waratahs ever being accused of this.
.
 

Torn Hammy

Johnnie Wallace (23)
I slot players into different types.

  • bargers.... Kepu, Dennis, Mumm, Horwill, Brown
  • line breakers.... Palu, Ioane, Mitchell, Cooper, Higginbotham, Genia, Kahui
  • finessers.... Cooper, Genia, White, Lilo, SBW, Guildford, Steyn, Lambie
  • flyers... Mitchell, Davies, Beale, O'Connor, Kingston
My feeling is that the Waratahs don't have finessers and are top heavy with bargers. Pakalani and Kingston are great flyers and Robinson, Pretorius and Palu are genuine line breakers.

A barger gets whacked all game every week, it's a hard to turn up every game. For periods of every game we see the Tah bargers look and play tired. Also when the opponent's bargers are as big and strong as yours then they will largely cancel each other out and then your game plan falters.

Last year's Shute Shield Grand final was battle between bargers (usyd) and finessers and line breakers (eastwood). The eastwood team was remarkable in that it had line breakers in almost every position and great finessers in White and Hola, and that is why they were able to beat a team that boasted 16 Super Rugby players.

I would like to see the Waratahs recruit a new 9, 10 combo that can finesse. White, Cooper or even Hola? We need more line breakers, though they are very rare. I honestly believe these people will get us over the line in those close games that we are continually losing.
 

rugbysmartarse

Alan Cameron (40)
I am wondering why the Tahs were so concerned about keeping the ball in the close, the widest it got on Friday was a cut out to Horne, the rest was inside ball/short balls through the 10-12 channel. Was it a concious decision to target Steyn? or a concern about the mobility of the pack to support a wider game?
I thought it was more to do with the passing capability of the centrre pairing. On a few occasions the option was to go to a second distributor (like hangers) running a second line and then on to a wider winger. Instead pretty much every ball went to AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) or Horne and ended there (with one notable exception)
 

Bullrush

Geoff Shaw (53)
I think some of tne Tah players are over-rated and so when they're playing, they're considered to be out of form when they are actually about as good as they usually are, and whe they are injured, it's deemed that an important cog in the machine is missing eg. Barnes, Lachie Tarner, Elsom, Horne.

Just a small thing....
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
I thought it was more to do with the passing capability of the centrre pairing. On a few occasions the option was to go to a second distributor (like hangers) running a second line and then on to a wider winger. Instead pretty much every ball went to AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) or Horne and ended there (with one notable exception)

mmm it ain't hard to catch and pass and loop
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top