Let me ask you this...
If injures have really had an effect... Which injured players would make a difference had they been playing in recent weeks?
You've pretty much had a full strength forward pack..
There's no hidden playmakers we don't know about?
Eh, if the Brumbies had that injury list (which amounts to a handful of players), but still fielded a team filled with Wallabies and experienced players like the Tahs then, no... it wouldn't be an excuse.
You obviously see the difference?
Please tell me you're not blind to the fact that there's a clear difference?
Injuries can never be an excuse, it can affect certain aspects of the teams play, but every side confronts injury issues, players have to perform regardless.
I reckon the first year yes......but the second, third and fourth should ring some alarm bells as to what the hell you're doing to your fly halvesIf you lose 4 fly-halves do you get some credit?
I think a fair bit of what is wrong with the Tahs can be traced back to the fawning Sydney media. Case in point the claims by Harris in the Oz today that the Tahs were the better team, and the SMH's claim that they can still make the finals, feed the propaganda which means the Tahs can deny they have serious problems.
what? since (say) 1985?
Why do the Tahs consistently fail to fulfill expectations year after year, even if their playing roster includes many wallabies and they represent one of the largest rugby talent pools in the country?
Is it "soft" coaching (e.g. inability to bench out-of-form stars and take hard decisions)?
Is it politics?
Is it incompetence by the administration?
Do injuries justify another poor season?
Does the rugby program needs to change?
What needs to be done to get this team back on the right track?
Complex situation.
There is no difference, the current coach was the defacto coach last year, nothing has changed. In the after match interview all the clown wanted to do was to tell us what they did well.My questions from last year remain valid. Answer why no matter who the players are and who is coach they play the same. Tell me how this years performances and tactics were different from last year? There were some subtle differences yes but the totality was no different.
They both also have support players who run a line and don't wait for the ball before commencing their run.It seems to me that a Tah backline movement is all about recycle. Ball runners cannot run a line before they get the ball,they must all stay behind the ball carrier for the recycle.KB (Kurtley Beale) manages to pass the ball to where the receiver should be, forcing them to run hard to it. I noticed quade do it a lot last year as well. It takes trust as well as skill, and I doubt any of the tahs have either enough to pull it off
There is no difference, the current coach was the defacto coach last year, nothing has changed. In the after match interview all the clown wanted to do was to tell us what they did well.
These fuckwits are kidding, when you lose you did not do well. Accept it so that you can address it and change it.
He is clearly not telling players they need to step it up, he is enabling them to perform poorly with no penalty.
that was their best in living memory but they didn't do well in s10 or whatever it was with macqueen, as I recallActually the last great Tahs side was the 1991-1992 side that beat the Welsh test team 65-0 (score from memory) coached by Rod Macqueen. Side after that was also handy under Greg Smith by then they were in decline and after 1995 they have been the professional side we see now, play Not to Lose, not playing to win. They had the game won 15 minutes to go and they shut up shop, even to the point of replacing attacking players with defensive units like Carter.