rugbysmartarse
Alan Cameron (40)
it's often seen that a very good performance is followed by a poorer performance, and vice versa. This leads most into thinking some winning teams get cocky or complacent after a good performance or get fired up after a poor one. The US Air Force even saw this trend and advised flight trainers not to praise good performances to eliminate complacency in pilots. The statistical reason for the phenomena is known as reversion to the mean. after a comparatively good or bad performance the most common follow up is one closer to their long term average performance.
What does this have to do with the tahs? well last season the win loss ratio was 11:5. 2011 it was 13:3. in 2010 it was 8:5 (these are regular season games only). So the long term average of the reds is an overall winning average (32:13). A statistician's answer would be the reds will revert to the mean and win next week.
What does this have to do with the tahs? well last season the win loss ratio was 11:5. 2011 it was 13:3. in 2010 it was 8:5 (these are regular season games only). So the long term average of the reds is an overall winning average (32:13). A statistician's answer would be the reds will revert to the mean and win next week.