OK Gnostic we get your point. Again.
The difference between the cases of Alexander and Elsom is simple. Alexander has not been playing all that badly in Super Rugby. He hasn't been setting the world on fire, but the Brumbies scrum has been pretty good and his workrate has been high. However numerous other tightheads have put their hand up for selection- Kepu, Palmer and Slipper. So now he sits third or fourth in the pecking order.
However whilst Elsom has been sidelined no number 6 has been outstanding. Brown has been his usual workhorse, Saffy has been good but inconsistent, Higgers and Leroy have been OK, Mowen started like a house on fire but has been quiet since. The principle candidates for 6 in Rocky's abscence are guys that have either been playing 8 (McCalman), or 4 (Horwill). So Rocky can still feel relatively safe in getting a spot in the starting XV.
The difference between the cases of Alexander and Elsom is simple. Alexander has not been playing all that badly in Super Rugby. He hasn't been setting the world on fire, but the Brumbies scrum has been pretty good and his workrate has been high. However numerous other tightheads have put their hand up for selection- Kepu, Palmer and Slipper. So now he sits third or fourth in the pecking order.
However whilst Elsom has been sidelined no number 6 has been outstanding. Brown has been his usual workhorse, Saffy has been good but inconsistent, Higgers and Leroy have been OK, Mowen started like a house on fire but has been quiet since. The principle candidates for 6 in Rocky's abscence are guys that have either been playing 8 (McCalman), or 4 (Horwill). So Rocky can still feel relatively safe in getting a spot in the starting XV.