And he never will if he's never given another chance.He's yet to show it at Test level though
And he never will if he's never given another chance.He's yet to show it at Test level though
Agreed, but he has shown more "test match" stuff at Super Rugby level than most of the other options.He's yet to show it at Test level though
Not until the RC I thinkI like Leota. He is big and strong but in the past he has been a bit loose in the carry. He is a good lineout target and can make do in the second row if need be. It really depends on what Schmidt is looking for. Since he picked Wright at 6 initially ahead of some more robust options it may not be what he is looking for? We will see.
Is he available?
I may be misremembering, but I feel that both Rennie and Jones have selected Leota in pretty much every test he's been available for from debut. He must be doing something right.
He's yet to show it at Test level though
He's already had 21 chances to be fairAnd he never will if he's never given another chance.
The other options haven't really had same opportunity yet to be fair. Leota is a decent player, but he's not just going to turn into Owen FinneganThat applies to almost every backrower who isn't Valetini or McReight...
Pete samu?That applies to almost every backrower who isn't Valetini or McReight...
Pete samu?
We could pick him if we allowed overseas players and Im saying in the past he's proven himselfSamu isn't around anymore...
The other options haven't really had same opportunity yet to be fair. Leota is a decent player, but he's not just going to turn into Owen Finnegan
The discussion was around dropping Cale for LeotaOutside of the current picks in the backrow - Wright, McReight, Valetini and Cale... I'm not sure who these other available, potentially better options are that haven't had the same opportunities?
The discussion was around dropping Cale for Leota