That’s fine. I never actually said we should only pick from the domestic comp. But you still haven’t named the players you thing were better who were available to be selected. No doubt you have some and I’m not trying to diminish your opinion - but I can’t think of any who were hands down better in their spot.
People are criticising Schmidt because he did, and he made a point of that, but he also said he never ruled anyone out. But where he had to make a choice he picked the player staying in Australian rugby.
- Skelton, Sio, Koroibete etc aren’t available for selection
- Guys like Holloway, Swinton, Canham, Rodda etc are all comparable but none of them are clearly better than the alternatives. Surely if it’s 50/50 you can see the logic of picking the player who you will have access to 100% of the time
- Nawaqanitwase & Gordon were possible also on contention but again neither were clearly the best option, even if they were staying. So again - like above why not go with who is staying. It would only be petty if they were clearly better choices, which they aren’t IMO
- the very thing people are complaining about - the leakage of players OS - is going to get far worse if we pick those guys on line ball choices. It also makes it much harder to build cohesion. If the best players on a piece of paper made the best team, NSW would’ve won far more State of Origin games