I think McCalman was shown up against the Samoans.
I think he is a good player and deserves to be in the team, but on a horses for courses basis. Against England, South Africa, Argentina and the Islander nations, which all thrive on big forwards, we should start with Samo. Against New Zealand, Wales, Ireland, etc, where work rate and ruck superiority is more important, give McCalman a run.
I'm not sure why Robinson has been getting ragged on. He wasn't amazing or even good when he came on, but he barely had time to make an impact. Hodgson was on from the beginning and looked well past it for the whole game. Would you really feel comfortable with Hodgson starting against the Boks, Poms or Kiwis if Pockock was injured?
I thought McCabe did well at 12. He would of looked a lot better if he was running outside of Cooper. I'm in favour of a straight running 12, to help Cooper. Atm A.Finger would have to be in front due to his excellent combination with Quade. However McCabe seems to have more potential than Finger, he has got more speed, power, etc and 'almost' as good on defence. IMO he could serve the same role as Finger, but their probably isn't time for the combination to develop so Finger would be the safer option.
I feel sorry for Gits in all this. I really feel he has gone backwards since going to the brumbies. He still has the talent, not as much as before, but it seems as though all his bad habits have been excentuated since at the ponies. Nothing against the brumbies, but he was playing like a world class 10 at the force. At times on Sunday, you could see him take the ball to the line (albeit rarely) and the backs looked on song for those phases. It didn't help with Phipps having a shocker.