No, I don't want him at the Tahs per se, but his development is going nowhere under Foley. It's a shame.Yeah. You'd love him in the Tahs. How about we get the same leg up from the ARU as the Tahs do and maybe we could compete.
Force defiantly would have won that were it not for the biased home town ref'. Despite the horrible bias shown against the Force (in every game) they defiantly should be a contender next year. The definitiveness in the face of such bias is a testament to their inner character and true supporters such as myself.
Don't be a dickhead. Nobody was complaining about the referee.
Force defiantly would have won that were it not for the biased home town ref'. Despite the horrible bias shown against the Force (in every game) they defiantly should be a contender next year. The definitiveness in the face of such bias is a testament to their inner character and true supporters such as myself.
I can see the argument for him to be sure, but as with the Pocock/Hooper argument much will depend on who is in the rest of the pack and exorcising the ball row. I just see him as the same sort of player as R. Brown, lots of workrate, very little impact in it. If it is workrate that is wanted I'd pick Hoiles before him for the lineout skills.He'd have more impact if he had some help around doing the same thing. The complementary effect of several forwards being dynamic is considerable. Good work rate, durable, and a bit of edge. Cheika likes that. Be amazed if he is not in the reckoning.
Vaea? Not yet.
Butler? Big future.
McMahon? 6/7 type of player, not 8.
Don't be a dickhead. Nobody was complaining about the referee.