Ealesy never played at Suncorp. At least for the reds.
I think the 130yrs thing is a good start. It would be odd having a statue of a player who never played at the ground as the first rugby union statue..
Perhaps a statue of Quade would be more appropriate.
I'm only half joking.
Apart from Genia and Horwill the other players have retired so he might surpass them eventually. He is being compared to entire careers.If Quade plays a commanding role in winning the 2015 RWC, if he plays a pivotal roll in guiding he Reds to another 1 or 2 GF appearances over the remainder of his career then he may be considered for a statue.
But in terms of players from the Modern Era, Quade still ranks well down compared to the likes of Tim Horan, Daniel Herbert and John Eales and even then he still has people like Latham, Kefu, Genia and Horwill to contend with.
Despite him still being on the upward trajectory, I think we should refrain from ever mentioning Cooper in the same breath as Eales or Horan.
Things will get a little crazy in here.
Couldn't they just put up a statue of a koala?
Couldn't they just put up a statue of a koala?
People won't know what a Koala is in 50 years time
Despite him still being on the upward trajectory, I think we should refrain from ever mentioning Cooper in the same breath as Eales or Horan.
Things will get a little crazy in here.
To the chargrin of many it always seems to me when older players are spoken about the adage applies:
'The older they get, the better they were"
Don't think the players themselves feel that way but supporters often do. It is impossible to compare players from different eras. The game today involves bigger men, heavier consistent contact, more matches, and so on
I know I'll get flogged on here for these IMO honest thoughts...