Scrubber2050
Mark Ella (57)
Actually agree on QC (Quade Cooper) when comparing to Eales and Horan as well as many others.
What confuses me is HOW we rate them Some considerations might be taken into account;
Number of Test matches;
Longivity (Number of years playing at top level;
Winning a/ Losing ratio
Types of games played (World Cups etc)
Tackles made
Runs made;
Domination over opposiing player;
Strength of Wallaby team;
Strength of Oppossition teams;
It just becomes endless and generally the selection of great players is the subjective recall of individuals (or groups) of how theiir favourvite player performed.
It seems odd to me how we can install somebody into the Hall of Fame who played that many years ago no-one is even alive to remember their undoubted great feats
What confuses me is HOW we rate them Some considerations might be taken into account;
Number of Test matches;
Longivity (Number of years playing at top level;
Winning a/ Losing ratio
Types of games played (World Cups etc)
Tackles made
Runs made;
Domination over opposiing player;
Strength of Wallaby team;
Strength of Oppossition teams;
It just becomes endless and generally the selection of great players is the subjective recall of individuals (or groups) of how theiir favourvite player performed.
It seems odd to me how we can install somebody into the Hall of Fame who played that many years ago no-one is even alive to remember their undoubted great feats