This whole loophole regarding quick shots at goal is downright silly....
Just a couple of thoughts -
- The referee should be checking with his assistants before he awards the try, and not afterwards - once the whistle is blown the decision should then be final. And only then can the shot at goal be taken.
- It unfairly favours the home team if the ref is able to be persuaded by the home ground screen to reverse his decision. There's no chance that the home ground is going to replay ad nauseum any errors by the home team leading up to a try.
Oddly enough, the Brumbies shouldn't have had the first try awarded where the loophole was applied, but the Alaalaatoa one, which was reviewed and denied, should have been awarded.... plus they would've had an easy shot at goal from in front.
Bonkers....
Totally agree, b. It's one thing our league cousins have got right, the ref has a look to his touchies to check there's nothing they saw to stop him awarding a try.
The current post-try situation places too much power in the hands of the home ground TV producer/screen operator.
As we had after Ala'alatoa's try last night- the first replay after the try was of Fardy's drop rather than the fantastic try. Cue a crowd riot and a referral to the TMO.
If the Rebels had scored that try, what are the odds we'd have a replay of the brilliant try and not the knock-on?
The stakes rise again in internationals. You'd have rocks in your head to think the Saffers won't be replaying every 50/50 decision ad bloody nauseam on the big screen.
I think there needs to be some protocols in place around what gets put on the big screen, and who has the power to make those decisions.
.
Reviews aside, the loophole is bs and sets a bad example for young rugby players everywhere. These players are meant to be role models and should always set a good example including fair play, don't teach kids that cheating and breaking the rules of the game we love is acceptable if you don't get caught. Set an example to be proud of. Rant over
Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk
We also teach our kids to play to the whistle.......which is what the Brums did.Reviews aside, the loophole is bs and sets a bad example for young rugby players everywhere. These players are meant to be role models and should always set a good example including fair play, don't teach kids that cheating and breaking the rules of the game we love is acceptable if you don't get caught. Set an example to be proud of. Rant over
Sent from my LG-H815 using Tapatalk
We also teach our kids to play to the whistle...which is what the Brums did.
Bit different than playing to the whistle.
Taking a kick super quick because you know it should not be a try and don't want a review is closer to cheating than playing to the whistle.
The whistle was blown indicating a try was awarded......playing to the whistle. We've been screwed over by worse tries awarded. Bulls of a couple of years ago, and the Stormers this year. In any case, we had a fair try denied later in the match; swings and roundabouts.Bit different than playing to the whistle.
Taking a kick super quick because you know it should not be a try and don't want a review is closer to cheating than playing to the whistle.
Bit different than playing to the whistle.
Taking a kick super quick because you know it should not be a try and don't want a review is closer to cheating than playing to the whistle.