I'll go with this one (and take a few liberties along the way) The Crusaders culture which Deans inherited and continued and his player selections suggest that "big", "strong" personalities that challenge the coaches aren't viewed so well.
Deans selections offer some support to those who think that he does not always pick the best, but the good player that will conform to the way he wants the team to play. ... Giteau is an outspoken player, not quite the introverted Elsom. Elsom is more Reuben Thorne. Deans certainly is prepared to take risks, but less so on players that have that maverick, independent streak that Giteau may possess.
I'll go with this one (and take a few liberties along the way) The Crusaders culture which Deans inherited and continued and his player selections suggest that "big", "strong" personalities that challenge the coaches aren't viewed so well. Umaga is the 2003 RWC is a good example. Umaga wrote that ""Despite being a senior player, I got no feedback at all - just: 'No, you're not in this week'. That was pretty typical of the Mitchell/Deans man-management style, which wasn't what I was used to," and "Mitchell and Deans had a core group of players whom they valued and listened to, and it didn't include me."
Deans selections offer some support to those who think that he does not always pick the best, but the good player that will conform to the way he wants the team to play. And frankly, there is nothing wrong with the coach exercising his prerogative. Giteau is an outspoken player, not quite the introverted Elsom. Elsom is more Reuben Thorne. Deans certainly is prepared to take risks, but less so on players that have that maverick, independent streak that Giteau may possess. (Posters that point out that Elsom is a maverick, or that I have chosen to neglect personalities such as Spencer, Justin Marshall and even Mehrtens are blatantly ignoring the fact that I am being selective in support of my narrative and quietly looking the other way when presented with evidence to the contrary).
pocock? he seems a bit quieter.
And rocky isnt?
In a side that had no forward momentum, they are pretty good stats. Although I see him becoming a world class 13 in the long term, probably in the mould of a Daniel Herbert. Seeing that he has played 3 games in his career at 12, it was always going to be a steep learning curve. But he looks up to task. If he has a strong game on Saturday, I suspect he will be at 12 until Barnes comes back.
How can you say he's the best 12 if he's hardly ever played there?personally , i believe that australia currently doesnt have the right candidate to be playing inside centre and outside centre . pat mccabe is not the complete number 12 , but he's the closest to it , this is why robbie deans favour him , i too think that pat mccabe is the best 12 in australia . i dont agree with alotta poster's here seeing pat as an outside centre , he's no outside centre . ........ so who should be playing outside centre ? ... to be quite honest , this is the missing piece of the puzzle , australia just doesnt have that special someone , who fit's into this role perfectly . ... this position surely does robbie's head in .
Genia and Pocock are quite mild-mannered off the field, as is Cooper. JOC (James O'Connor) has the biggest head in the universe.There is nothing introverted about Nau, Robinson, Horwill, Pocock, Genia, Cooper, JOC (James O'Connor), Mitchell, Beale or Ioane. I'd suggest that Deans is molding his game plan around these people, not the other way round.
Genia and Pocock are quite mild-mannered off the field, as is Cooper. JOC (James O'Connor) has the biggest head in the universe.
Daniel Herbert wasn't a world class 13.
I don't think mild mannered is the same as introverted. Introverted means inward looking. I doubt any of those blokes are inward looking. A person can be quite reserved and yet impose himself very effectively on his surroundings.
He's still got nothing on Geoffrey Boycott.