Think that's the case for most of them, although ISA have a squad named now.. and haven't even started their season.
Hasn’t really progressed in 3 years. In my eyes he should be moved to 13, he had a big impact their last year. Did nothing on the wing this year.
that's harsh. he has put on some size
Yes, with all the different pathways it can become a nightmare and a huge load on the players depending on what teams that are playing in including club (if permitted by their school)
Sounds like a challenge to anyone who could create a flow chart.
Yes, after the Kings game.
Might be more accurate to say that top-liner Cooper Green returned from injury and Dooley made way. Both performed well and Dooley somewhat unlucky but Green was always going to figure in this campaign.
Perhaps, although 5 weeks of incumbency v someone who hadn’t played a game higher than 2s. I reckon that is dropped. You say tomato, etc.
Well they do, they play for Australia U18s, This ensures the top 18 YO can play even if they are at Uni or have left school, aligning with the rest of the world.
I have been very impressed with the 10 from Shore, Robertson An outstanding defender in the middle, who actually carries the ball and threatens the line
My apologies. I thought that it was Knox that won the game in the in the final plays, but it was actually St Augustine's.
The GPS 1sts team will probably be the best all round. However, I believe that if you put the best players from ISA in a backline against the best backline possible from GPS regardless of league contracts or injuries, ISA this year would probably have the better backline.
Oh my days, I can't believe I put Newington into the ladder, I must have just seen View beating them and assumed they were in it. My apologies
