Brumbies have too many should have beens. Players that could have been great but it never really happened.
T.Smith, Josh Valentine, Frankie, Gits, Holes,
Brumbies have too many should have beens. Players that could have been great but it never really happened.
T.Smith, Josh Valentine, Frankie, Gits, Holes,
Brumbies have too many should have beens. Players that could have been great but it never really happened.
T.Smith, Josh Valentine, Frankie, Gits, Holes,
Gits has been a great... but I don't think taking a large sum of money and going to the Force has helped his career...
.
I thought Gits played some great rugby at 10 in the West and has gone backwards since returning to the ACT
Agreed but that was in some ways because they played a very Gits centric game-plan involving much more depth than one would usually play with.
You can't base your game around 1 play at international level.
You build a game to play to your strengths, it worked pretty well, most sides build a game to the strengths of their play maker
Before folks want to get rid of Tyrone Smith they should think who will replace him.
Somebody mentioned a cast of players but none of them are specialist 12's - A.Smith FFS. People sometimes discuss centres as though a fellow who is good at inside centre can be just as good at outside centre, and vice versa. They are different positions and anybody who watches the game closely knows that there are fewer elite 12s around the traps than 13s. True some folks can play either position with equal facility at the professional level but they are very bloody rare outside of France.
The comment that made sense was mudskipper mentioning Lealiifano as a 12. Fair enough, and Stubbs is a terrific player for the Runners and may get some time on the park also.
Why not have Giteau at 12 and To'omua at 10?
Then who do you move to 15? Lealiifano? Isn't he a 10? I don't think he's played at fullback.