Who plays 13 if you move Hodge to 15? That seems the most unlikely change to happen. I can't see Meakes debuting at 13 when he is normally a 12.
What exactly did To'omua do to suggest things will go better with him starting?
Anyway, 10/12/13 shouldn't change for this Saturday and they won't change.
Given the squad available, I think it would have to be Meakes to 13. DHP might be an option but he looked completely underdone last weekend. The absence of Rona or English in the squad is a selection problem, not mine.
I believe that, except for the period Matt was suffering a spate of head injuries, he was a far more accomplished player than BF, whether at 10 or 12. In combination with Quade Cooper at 10, he was perhaps the stand out performer in the 12 spot in recent years. I think Beale is a similar player to Cooper with an attacking, off the cuff style of play predominant. It is the combination of Beale with To'omua that I would like to see tested. We know what BF brings, and it's not enough to get us consistent wins against other top level test sides. Immediately, the defense will be tighter with To'omua in place of Foley, the kicking game will be more effective with both Beale and To'omua taking the tactical kicks and Hodge the pressure relieving kicks from the danger zone.
I do not think there is any chance at all that the changes I'd like to see will happen for Bledisloe 2. The same 10/12/13 will no doubt be repeated. But, my question is, what happens then if we have the same or similar result as Bledisloe 1? When will it be time to try something different? Or will it be the case that it is too close to the RWC to change horses in midstream?
My thoughts are that changes should have been tried last year, at that time with Cooper in place of Foley for at least some starts to see if the alternative had any legs. It is the reluctance of the coaches to test options in weaker areas of the Wallabies that I question. Anyway, the Cooper horse has bolted, so imo this Rc has to see some other options and combinations tried if the results don't dramatically improve in the next test or two.