Let's say our backline is:
9. Genia, 10. Foley, 11. DHP/Mitchell, 12. Giteau, 13. Kuridrani/Kerevi 14. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), 15. Folau
22. Phipps, 23. ???
If you only have the two back reserves, it creates a big potential shuffle if there is an injury.
Let's say 23 is To'omua. He covers 10/12. If 13 or one of the back three goes down, who plays there? It probably means To'omua on the wing because anything else is a big reshuffle. You could potentially move Foley to fullback and To'omua or Giteau to 10 but moving your 10 due to an injury elsewhere is a pretty big reshuffle.
If 23 is Kerevi you could say that he covers 12, 13, 14. Giteau becomes your reserve 10, and DHP/Mitchell/AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) your reserve fullback.
That could be a decent option in this scenario.
Cheika will not shift Foley at 10, don't we remember when he brought QC (Quade Cooper) on the wing and keeping Foley at 10 instead of re-shuffling the backline. And this was in a game when Foley was really struggling to have any sort of impact.
^^^^the video on that article would appear to have TK in the B team. Kerevi or Folau at 13?
Let's say our backline is:
9. Genia, 10. Foley, 11. DHP/Mitchell, 12. Giteau, 13. Kuridrani/Kerevi 14. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), 15. Folau
22. Phipps, 23. ???
If you only have the two back reserves, it creates a big potential shuffle if there is an injury.
Let's say 23 is To'omua. He covers 10/12. If 13 or one of the back three goes down, who plays there? It probably means To'omua on the wing because anything else is a big reshuffle. You could potentially move Foley to fullback and To'omua or Giteau to 10 but moving your 10 due to an injury elsewhere is a pretty big reshuffle.
If 23 is Kerevi you could say that he covers 12, 13, 14. Giteau becomes your reserve 10, and DHP/Mitchell/AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) your reserve fullback.
That could be a decent option in this scenario.
If you are going 6/2 you need a true utility back in the 23 jersey IMO. Much as I love Kerevi I wouldn't be putting him at 23 in a 6/2 bench as he is not a utility. Even To'omua doesn't really cover the outside backs positions.
With Beale and Hunt both out of contention the obvious player for my mind is Hodge. Cooper would be another option with his recent experience at fullback for Toulon, depending on the makeup of the rest of the backline.
Bench will be a 6:3 split.
Starters:
9. Phipps
10. Foley
12. Gits
Bench
21. Genia
22. Cooper
23. To'omua
Straight swap all players with 30mins to go and Cheika gets a good look who's gunna hold their positions for the rest of the season.
I should be a coach
To change the subject, did anybody notice that Matthew Burke picked Giteau at 10 in his team in the Hurled?
Let's say our backline is:
9. Genia, 10. Foley, 11. DHP/Mitchell, 12. Giteau, 13. Kuridrani/Kerevi 14. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), 15. Folau
22. Phipps, 23. ???
If you only have the two back reserves, it creates a big potential shuffle if there is an injury.
Let's say 23 is To'omua. He covers 10/12. If 13 or one of the back three goes down, who plays there? It probably means To'omua on the wing because anything else is a big reshuffle. You could potentially move Foley to fullback and To'omua or Giteau to 10 but moving your 10 due to an injury elsewhere is a pretty big reshuffle.
If 23 is Kerevi you could say that he covers 12, 13, 14. Giteau becomes your reserve 10, and DHP/Mitchell/AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) your reserve fullback.
That could be a decent option in this scenario.
If you'd pick Kerevi above Hodge for 12 or 13 though then I don't see why you'd pick Hodge because he can also play 15. In my scenario you'd probably have DHP on one win so he'd be your reserve fullback.
Both of them are out of position on the wing but it's doable.
Hodge wouldn't be brought on at 10 so the fact that he can play there a bit of a moot point in my opinion.
All that said, I think Cheika will go for a regular 5:3 bench. The 6:2 bench limits your tactical replacements if you're looking at someone being a finisher (i.e. Cooper from the Foxsports article) rather than having 6 backs you expect to play the whole game and one player as injury cover for them.
It's not just that Hodge can play 15, but that being able to play 15 gives better cover across the outside backs. With his two positions being 12 and 15 (which are the two most specialist playmaking/kicking positions outside the halves) he pretty much covers the full backline, whereas Kerevi doesn't. I feel that someone who can play 15 well is better equipped to cover the depth role of a winger - wingers should be able to field kicks, contest attacking kicks and to kick themselves, which is not something Kerevi is used to. Especially against the All Blacks who are likely to pepper us with kicks.
So in this particular instance of Hodge vs Kerevi, Kerevi has the edge at 13 but all other positions I give the edge to Hodge. When you've only got one spare back spot, Hodge is the clear choice IMO.
There are certainly ways you can work it so that Kerevi does fit on a 6/2 bench but it does require more extensive re-shuffling of positions and combinations. I firmly believe it's best to limit shuffling to the minimum necessary.
That's all just my personal preference, though. Inexplicably, Cheika has once again forgotten to consult me on the issue.
It's not just that Hodge can play 15, but that being able to play 15 gives better cover across the outside backs. With his two positions being 12 and 15 (which are the two most specialist playmaking/kicking positions outside the halves) he pretty much covers the full backline, whereas Kerevi doesn't. I feel that someone who can play 15 well is better equipped to cover the depth role of a winger - wingers should be able to field kicks, contest attacking kicks and to kick themselves, which is not something Kerevi is used to. Especially against the All Blacks who are likely to pepper us with kicks.
So in this particular instance of Hodge vs Kerevi, Kerevi has the edge at 13 but all other positions I give the edge to Hodge. When you've only got one spare back spot, Hodge is the clear choice IMO.
There are certainly ways you can work it so that Kerevi does fit on a 6/2 bench but it does require more extensive re-shuffling of positions and combinations. I firmly believe it's best to limit shuffling to the minimum necessary.
That's all just my personal preference, though. Inexplicably, Cheika has once again forgotten to consult me on the issue.
Bench will be a 6:3 split.
Starters:
9. Phipps
10. Foley
12. Gits
Bench
21. Genia
22. Cooper
23. To'omua
Straight swap all players with 30mins to go and Cheika gets a good look who's gunna hold their positions for the rest of the season.
I should be a coach
You don't want two inside backs on the bench