My question re Beale/Foley is this:
Nothing has changed too much since the French tests. Beale's form has improved marginally, but you could say the same for Foley as well. If Link was truly considering this move (and it must have been in his mind), then why wasn't KB (Kurtley Beale) given a game at 10 in the 3rd test? Would have been a nice trial and allowed him to develop combinations with White and To'omua.
Now I feel like the French series was something of a waste, in terms of our backline anyway, and we go in to the first Bled a bit underdone.
.
I disagree about the French tests being a waste of time playing Foley at 10.
Foley went in with great form, had a merely average first game in a very strong team performance, and below average second and third games.
http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/wallabies-v-france-1st-test-player-ratings/
http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/australia-v-france-ii-player-ratings/
http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/australia-v-france-iii-player-ratings/
(You personally may not agree with that person who did the second ratings, he sounds sus!)
Now, Foley's performance may improve with time as he gets used to a backline without Beale doing a lot of the organising. But I think Link wants to try Beale first.
Through this year, Beale has improved his playmaking, stepping up into first receiver over and over for the Tahs. Posts just up from mine say it best: Beale was the creator for the Tahs in the final, not Foley.
Both Beale and Foley have been playing really well, but I think two things pushed this selection:
1) Foley's performances vs the French
2) Beale noticeable organisation of the Tahs backline in the second half of the season, culminating in the final