The EOI criteria a vague enough for the ARU not to select any team for whatever reason they want. It would be good to have teams in all the major cities but I can't see the ARU agreeing to it. They don't want teams to be up and running and then asking for financial help. I can't see the long term viability of a team in Adelaide but I am happy to be proven wrong. I don't think I have all the answers and at least they are getting involved.
I'm not advocating for or against any place or team, but in general terms if the administration is efficient and effective and the finances are healthy, the team concerned will be successful.
As a case in point in the early 90s Randwick, Warringah and Gordon were 3 of the strongest clubs in Sydney, since that time each of them has experienced either poor management or financial difficulties. The result being that in the past few year each of them have struggled. The reverse is true of Sydney Uni, Manly and Sthn Districts, each of whom struggled in the early 90s, finising mid-field at best as a result of either inefficient management or lack of finance. Each of those clubs are now well managed and/or are financially sound and it's no coincidence that they have been at the top of the ladder in the past few years.
As a control, Eastwood have been well-managed and financially sound for the whole time and have remained at or near the top.
The Waratahs are another case in point, but we don't have the time or the space to go there.