Search results

Thought - didnt take long, could be part of our problem

Unfortunately it didn't result in the bacon. "what our stategy is" I'll think on that for a moment.

Best examples of the ruck and hitting it. How many counter rucks do we allow our ball to be turned over v how many do we achieve. Without the go forward we aren't crossing the ad line, thus are not building, thus aren't turning 70% possession stats into points.

All good and ILTW kept it simple and accurate. Plant the seeds and let it grow, water it, and spend time on it. To good thing well, repeat, review, improve, repeat. Keep it simple, there is no need to over complicate opportunity.

SebV Agree with Hooper Also Hodge to 12. Kerevi cant kick, there are times you need a kicker playing both sides. Also Hodge can out kick Foley and QC (Quade Cooper) and should be first choice kicker. People haven't seen the vision that Hodge has because they haven seen him - he grew up playing 10 and reached...

product of CHS rugby

As above, I'd have Izzy at 13, and KB (Kurtley Beale) at 15 with a selected back three. Remember when we had Andrew Walker / Joe Roff working off a solid centre pairing that built off each other. Maybe the back three is KB (Kurtley Beale) / DHP / and ??

Hodge's D was there last night and some could say carries the D of QC (Quade Cooper) and Foley so that is far more than kicking. He brings far more at 2nd 5 than he does on the wing, but seriously with all the pill we had last night what was created for the outside backs. Still think out most potent back line...

Yeah the one for about 65 out went just under, The second just to the left. Then to the right. A small 1mm at the tea, the further the ball travels the bigger the distance.

Wingers score tries. Earn the right to go wide. And dont fuck it up in the process.

Cheers - what about of you are stuck outside of Aus

Would anyone have a link to watch it free and live?

Must say, glad we moved away from he quota rule. It is proof that the Shute Shield can match it with the non test player Super teams.

Hope it wasn't at Manly Oval, he'd need a ladder constantly up against the wall at the old Fisho's to get up on the roof. But as you said - hard work and practice, i believe it was at a single pole, and not between the sticks.

Melrose & Turtle are both good coaches, and they bring different strengths. Most coaching gigs are 2 - 3 years, silly HR comparison. People have referenced Phil Blake in the preceding posts - what are his stints like, I can rattle off many other successful coaches with 2 - 3 years stints.

Agree. Both good, but different coaches. I dont think the coach selection should have been put out to tender.

I could go back over my posts, to prove what i said. We were on top. We made a replacement. We went down once that replacement was made. In the end the team that scored the most points after 80 won. Your posts are consistantly a stir.

I'm not going to disagree with you - agree with your point as well. Timani & McMahon both came on - one created impact and had an impact on result, the other didn't. I see benefit both ways - the game isn't won in the last 20 it is set up in the first 60 - you need best players on the park so...

Not a chance. When you read between the lines and know when someone is posting with sincerity, and you know someone is posting to stir.

I agree, McMahon for the last 20 was fantastic the other week. That is the sort of guy you want coming off the bench - IMPACT.