My concern is really to move forward it requires bold and brave decisions and given RA has lost a lot of credibility I don't think they are prepared to be brave or bold and which is required (and why like many think they are likely to agree to new super rugby concept that does not take us forward and only benefits NZ) and where in contrast Twiggy can be brave and bold with his plans. There has got to be some sort of leverage here for wider oz professional rugby to get more out of twiggy's plans and money. But like all we are still none the wiser if that is even close to reality.The Wayne Smith article isn't that surprising. Of course we're not masters of our SANZAAR destiny - we never have been.
Now RA are faced with an unpalatable choice: run it back with a format that's not working, or blow it up and walk away and hope you can build something with the rubble that remains.
The local comp is fine and would work as the A-League and NBA do - a cheap local imitation of the rich foreign leagues, where a small cohort of fans watch talented youngsters, ageing vets and players who aren't quite good enough for Europe battle it out.
Then our Wallabies fly in for the international season and we maybe pick up our wider fanbase.
So really the situation is the same as it was a year ago, and 600 pages ago. We're between a rock and a hard place.
Fuck.
.
Australian Super Rugby teams are verging on this ^^^^ description already.
and aren't we already at a small cohort of fans?? note the drop from 700k+ for tests down to 50-60k for Super Rugby games.
You don't really believe that do you RN? I can tell you the reason NZ are keen on a round robin is because the players are saying it to hard to play the other NZ teams twice , look at the injuries as a point.Having now read Wayne Smiths Article "Super Solutions to resist change" in the Australian it confirmed we are a million miles away from NZ in terms of what they want out of Super Rugby vs what Australia needs out of it.
NZ wants round robin format so that all their top NZ sides don't have to play a lower Super Rugby side in quarter finals. .
on the $$$. Super Rugby will send oz rugby broke eventually. with crowd and viewer numbers being what they are, revenue from game days and merch sales will be in free fall - that impacts the state unions - Reds have been broke before and the same conditions are in place for them to go broke again - and i would think other teams are barely holding it together. RA will need to pick up that tab. There is no way that a continuation of Super Rugby will get an increase in broadcast dollars. the next deal would be the same a last AT BEST - and probably backwards in real terms. however going backwards in nominal and real terms and is a strong possibility.
Comps that bleed fans and viewers eventually bleed money. its coming.
Yeh I am actually not convinced twiggy ball as go alone viable or best option but joint RA-twiggy ball co-ordination could be and put the power back in the hands of Australia to control its own destiny which it Cleary can’t with super rugby and SANZAAR. That is why I keep banging on about hope for RA and twiggy’s team to pool resources and work on better option together.What are Twiggy's plans though? Some on this thread are putting an awful amount of faith in a product that is yet to be even announced.
I am pro-Twiggy and think RA should be working with him, but I'm not ready to declare Twiggyball the future of the game until I see what it actually is...
.
But what part of that is going to bring in new fans, moving the deckchairs achieves what?
Thanks Dan54 - ok I can see broader reasons why NZ would want round robin but still not convinced serves oz interests from the fact a cross borders competition as it stands does not allow for equalisation of teams and uncertainty of outcome. AFL addresses imbalance by draft system where teams finishing lower get priority picks, Twiggy trying to address this for WSR via marquee player system and also trying to get those oz players who play for any WSR team eligible for Wallabies. Point being we need a system to make for better equalisation of talent across teams across borders for Super Rugby to work imho. And yes Super 12 was successful but I doubt it would be now as people have moved on from that in oz and really want to be able follow teams playing in time zone friendly formats, but also where uncertainty of outcome. When Super 12 was played oz rugby was stronger as was SA cf NZ teams, but to make such a competition sustainable we need a situation where you can address such imbalances as kills interest in the game and in particular in oz where strong rival domestic football codes of NRL, AFL and Soccer that are domestic based and hence don't have the same problems of cross border politics and has the tools to provide for equalisation of talent etc.You don't really believe that do you RN? I can tell you the reason NZ are keen on a round robin is because the players are saying it to hard to play the other NZ teams twice , look at the injuries as a point.
You know because Wayne Smith says it doesn't actually mean it true!!
You just have to listen to when players are interviewed, you will get more idea than reading an article by Wayne Smith I woukld think.
I will add Super 12 was by far the best version of the comp, and lo and behold it was round robin!!
Motivated vs just can't match NZ team standards are two different things.The fact that our teams will be motivated to play better by a finals system that relies purely on merit.
Given the respective depth and level of both countries at the moment, the quickest way to ensure more kiwi derbies is to swap to a round robin for a year or two before the game goes completely bust here.You don't really believe that do you RN? I can tell you the reason NZ are keen on a round robin is because the players are saying it to hard to play the other NZ teams twice , look at the injuries as a point.
You know because Wayne Smith says it doesn't actually mean it true!!
You just have to listen to when players are interviewed, you will get more idea than reading an article by Wayne Smith I woukld think.
I will add Super 12 was by far the best version of the comp, and lo and behold it was round robin!!
.....we need a situation where you can address such imbalances as kills interest in the game and in particular in oz where strong rival domestic football codes of NRL, AFL and Soccer that are domestic based and hence don't have the same problems of cross border politics and has the tools to provide for equalisation of talent etc.
Super Rugby is good for NZ but doomed for Oz as different market with highly competitive rival domestic based football codes and hence oz interests clearly not aligned with NZ interests.
Should this not be the concern of Australia's domestic competition? Play Super Rugby in the S12/14 era sprint at the start of the season, then everyone goes to their own respective domestic competitions that they have full control over. If Australia wants to run a 20+ week competition with a draft, timed scrums, 9 point tries, flashing lights and what-have-you, then go for it. Might even package it up with the NPC and Currie Cup for a broadcasting deal (or not, IDK).
This is how it worked/works for NZ and SA and seems like what JO'N should've done a decade ago, instead of trying to do it on the cheap via Super Rugby.
. I don't actually believe that soccer is as strong here as many seem to think, it is a game supported mainly be expats.
you are wanting to start rugby's version of the A league where the Aussie comp is an inferior comp and so only produces inferior international team.