Quick Hands
David Wilson (68)
The $17m 'cash' is significantly due to a one-off Govt grant for a glossy new HQ in Sydney. It will depart the ARU's bank account with a scary regularity and trend.
What people often forget is this: the appallingly low crowd figures that the State RUs are getting for their home Super matches will quite rapidly filter through to a major decline in both sponsorships income and net gate income (net gate income is material to the State RU's finances and solvency, net gate falls off exponentially once gross gate income falls close to fully loaded stadium rent and game operating costs) in 2018 and 2019 (why will 2019 be an better, it will likely be worse on current trends).
Accordingly, it's a good bet that multiple State RU bail outs will be needed by some time in 2019, or maybe early 2020. These will be of a very material size in relation to the ARU's increasingly fragile core operating - not 'one offs - cash flows. The fact that the game is so on the nose with sponsors and others external - plus the visual impact of the dreaded empty stands - will impact ongoing ARU and State RU income for sure both this year and subsequently.
Multi million $ bailouts for say the Rebels, Reds and Brumbies in late 2019 could easily total $6-$10m cash just for starters. (How much have the Rebels burnt through of ARU/RA $s - $25m+? Stop laughing.)
When we turn to 2020..the ARU's income, and its ability to pass income to the State RUs as operating subsidies, in recent years has been hugely bolstered by another not-to-be-repeated one off, namely the exceptional bidding war in the UK that was for overall Super Rugby TV rights. Every media observer in the UK says that will never happen again.
Given what we all see of the rapidly dilapidating Super Rugby comp today, surely no one expects the post 2020 Super Rugby gross media income per country to be anything like what it has been in the last 4 years, it's almost certain to experience a very material reduction from 2020. This will seriously damage Australian rugby's core financial viability.
Wallaby Test attendances and related income - another key RA income source - are in free fall (still plenty of seats free for the Ireland Tests) and that is always worsened in a RWC year as next year is when there's likely no June series and a shortened RC and BC.
Then we must factor in the likelihood - happening more rapidly already - of more and more elite players here moving to Europe for higher immediate incomes and better income prospects over their whole career cycles (plus the smarter ones smell the crash coming to Australian rugby here). The gate and weakened media impact of the less good players remaining will clearly negatively impact the gross income prospects of the code as a whole.
So just look at the emerging aggregate financial dynamics of Aust pro rugby as a whole and a picture of seriously deteriorating core net cash flows arises of a type that even 'one offs' won't fix and of a type that no sensible bank would fund.
Where will the saviour arise from and why? Well, the best and most likely saviour will be World Rugby working to radically restructure the code here in close concert with managerial and coaching resources provided by the NZRU that also has a massive vested interest in rugby not irrevocably collapsing in Australia. All this will be to the good as the serious and extraordinary costly incompetence by which the game is governed here can be finally washed away in one radical sweep of deep cleansing.
Very well put.
I note that in the last RWC year (2015), the ARU lost money.
The parent entity lost $9,849,000
The consolidated entity lost $6,329,000
I'm sure that someone can explain the difference. (page 8 of the financial report attached)
https://issuu.com/australianrugbyunion/docs/aru_web?e=24291087/34741796
There's no reason to expect that a similar loss won't occur in 2019.
They also lose money when there is a BIL tour of NZ or SA as with last year where they lost $3.8 million (after $21 million specific purpose grant excluded)
As I observed a few pages back, they seem not to budget on a 4 year cycle taking into account lean years of RWC and BIL. What they do is in those year feign surprise at making a loss and use the forgoing as an excuse which was totally unexpected.