Mr Pilfer
Jim Clark (26)
I have seen a few people quote this but haven't actually seen anything official to confirm this.
What are the actual numbers allowed and are the Force still allowed 1 or 2 more than the others?
Western Force 2025
- Thread starter RugbyReg
- Start date
What are the actual numbers allowed and are the Force still allowed 1 or 2 more than the others?
ForceFan
Chilla Wilson (44)
Don't know the actual number for any squad.
Tomikin
David Codey (61)
I think it's being encouraged to sign wallaby eligible players, but not enforced. E.g we prefer you sign these guys not none eligible players. Which is fair I think it should be the aim now with 4 teams
Yoda
Tom Lawton (22)
As long as the Tahs don’t get them all !
Understand the limited contract argument but am not personally convinced squeezing international players out is for the greater good.
Expect the Brums will not be as competetive without Browne, Tua etc.
Also blocks external perspectives & experiences which impedes player devempment imo.
Mr Pilfer
Jim Clark (26)
Because of no rugby Australia top up. They better make sure we get LSL (Lukhan Salakaia-Loto) or Canham instead then!
Wilson
Michael Lynagh (62)
You just got Swain. I can't see any reason for RA to push Salakaia-Loto or Canham to the Force if they're not already interested in heading there.
Rodda likely isn't getting a top up because he hasn't played for the wallabies since 2021, and has barely been on the field the last 2 years it's very hard to justify spending the extra on him, wherever he's playing.
rugbyAU
Colin Windon (37)
Now confirmed he’s released from his contract on June 30
Mr Pilfer
Jim Clark (26)
The article about Rodda leaving says that rugbyau offered him a wallaby top up to go to the tahs. If that is true then the Force should be asking for a please explain. This certainly doesn't alleviate the suspicions that rugby australia will be doing everything they can to get the best Rebels players to go to the Tahs who they own (conflict of interest anyone?)
Strewthcobber
Andrew Slack (58)
Isn't the answer just that Rodda didn't want to stay in Perth for what was being offered. They tried to get him to stay in Australia by offering more money, and also an alternative place to play in Sydney, and he chose not to take that offer either?
What's the issue?
TSR
Mark Ella (57)
The issue is that an increased offer was conditional on him moving. I would understand if the Force had 3 other Wallaby locks on their books - but they don’t.
Edit: having said that, my interpretation of the article was that the main reason he didn’t sign was that by the time RA increased the offer he had already sourced a deal elsewhere
Mr Pilfer
Jim Clark (26)
You don’t see an issue with the same player getting offered a wallaby top up to go to the tahs but not to stay with the force??
The top up system has always been unfair and now the tahs are owned by Rugby Australia it will be worse. Who do you think Phil Waugh would prefer to see the best players go too?
Strewthcobber
Andrew Slack (58)
We don't know if that's what happened, do we?
He may have been offered a top-up to play at the Force as well, he said no to that, and then RA said what about a top-up and a move to Sydney?
Last edited:
Rodda has form in deciding where he doesn't want to be. He walked out on the Reds when they were taking reduced contracts due to COVID. The Force thought that they had avoided that form in a post COVID world but now have found out the reality. He has barely played, hasn't demonstrated much for years, and then when the new Wallabies coach doesn't select him away he goes. Good for him in choosing what pays the most but hopefully he can see out his playing years overseas and not entice any Australian Super Rugby teams on his potential anymore.