• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Western Force 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.

GaffaCHinO

Peter Sullivan (51)
So where does Seymour play? Bennetts could play 12, I reckon.
he could also be a 12 he has played a few games at club level here in Perth at 12 but he could be cover of the bench. Means Harvey won't be there which is a good thing I'm thinking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

RedsHappy

Tony Shaw (54)
sounds like the reds about 4 years ago aru bail outs that is

Yes. And a big leading indicator of the gradually emerging pre-2010 QRU train wreck was that of crowd numbers' gradual decline. A proxy for $ income of course, but also the crucial parameter of depth of fan attachment and 'non core' fans moving away and leaving all but the then Reds 'hard core loyalist' fans that were nowhere near large enough to provide adequate cash income for the cost base the QRU had. Crisis foretold by poor business and team management.

I think a trend line drawn through Force's home crowds 2009-12 (so far) would be major warning sign.

Be assured: I want to see the Force succeed and prosper in the interests of Australian rugby's health. The decisions the Force's management make in the next 6 months (or less) re coaching resources, the big back line rebuild so clearly required, etc, will surely seal this franchise's fate for the next 3 years. IMO, it will either go relatively quickly upwards under a talented new coach and backs squad, or will replicate the 2006-2009 QRU model of gradual, serious failure.
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
They might have a go at seral as his time would be up at the tahs he already has a combination going with sais from their time at the cheetahs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting observation. It certainly is a possibility. That being said, is Sheehan off this year?

Holmes and him are both pretty decent HBs, plus that youngster you're developing that's always injured is quality.
 

GaffaCHinO

Peter Sullivan (51)
Interesting observation. It certainly is a possibility. That being said, is Sheehan off this year?

Holmes and him are both pretty decent HBs, plus that youngster you're developing that's always injured is quality.
Yeah as far a I know Sheehan is going and turner is very good but yes always injured. I think Holmes had a very good game on the weekend he just hasn't had much game time but hopefully he stays on.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
T

TOCC

Guest
Yes. And a big leading indicator of the gradually emerging pre-2010 QRU train wreck was that of crowd numbers' gradual decline. A proxy for $ income of course, but also the crucial parameter of depth of fan attachment and 'non core' fans moving away and leaving all but the then Reds 'hard core loyalist' fans that were nowhere near large enough to provide adequate cash income for the cost base the QRU had. Crisis foretold by poor business and team management.

I think a trend line drawn through Force's home crowds 2009-12 (so far) would be major warning sign.

Be assured: I want to see the Force succeed and prosper in the interests of Australian rugby's health. The decisions the Force's management make in the next 6 months (or less) re coaching resources, the big back line rebuild so clearly required, etc, will surely seal this franchise's fate for the next 3 years. IMO, it will either go relatively quickly upwards under a talented new coach and backs squad, or will replicate the 2006-2009 QRU model of gradual, serious failure.

Crowds are not a leading indicator, they are a lagging indicator in many regards.. RugbyWA operates under a vastly different financial model to the QRU of 2009-2010. I think it's insulting for RugbyWA to even be compared.
 

p.Tah

John Thornett (49)
THE Western Force will use Super Rugby's international break to take on a South Australian invitational side on June 22 at Hindmarsh Stadium in Adelaide.

The match will be the first time a Super Rugby team has played in Adelaide, with the Force using the match to prepare for their June 30 showdown with the Brumbies in Perth.

The Force have posted just three wins this season, and have a bye this round ahead of the competition's three-week break.

The South Australian invitational side will feature a mix of local and interstate players, some of whom have international and Super experience.

"Like South Australia, we live in an AFL-dominated state and so we are pleased to be heading over to help them grow the game and lift the rugby profile,'' Force chief executive Vern Reid said.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/r...ide-during-break/story-fnbyu4s6-1226374757866
 

RedsHappy

Tony Shaw (54)
Crowds are not a leading indicator, they are a lagging indicator in many regards.. RugbyWA operates under a vastly different financial model to the QRU of 2009-2010. I think it's insulting for RugbyWA to even be compared.

Leading or lagging, that's a matter of debate in this context.

I don't see the applicable financial models and their time periods as you note as being 'vastly different' at all. Their core income source types are/were the same, and they both receive material grants from the ARU.

There's no 'insult' to Rugby WA in this. I didn't suggest that RWA was in imminent danger of collapse, rather that danger trends were mounting IMO. I was commenting on concerning financial and fan attendance trends. In this year' RWA Annual Report, the Chairman directly refers to a downturn in gate receipts in 2011 v 2010 and remember the S15 new structure added 2 more home games per season to each franchise as I recall. He also politely criticises the ARU for a significant reduction in its $ grant to RWA.
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
I wonder if the force will go after Zack Holmes again.

You wonder why the force have guys like seymour and harvey playing for them and not this guy.

With blokes lime To'omua and Leliafano at the Brumbies Holmes would be a fool not to go West, specially seeing as I'd be hailed as a homecoming.
 

Bowside

Peter Johnson (47)
The force like to make out like they are short on talent, but the reason the backline is so shit is because they have let Holmes and Swanepoel go and turner and godwin are yet to make the step up.

If they could get those 4 together, along with sias and another halfback - then that is 6 decent enough inside backs. From there a couple of those players will establish themselves.

I understand swanepoel has now fucked his visa up by playing a season with canterbury, so this is not a realistic proposition, but still.

Cummins, Mafi, toupou, wara and dellit are all decent enough squad players. I think they should give holmes (the scrumhalf) a run at 12 before the seasons out to see how he performs.

The brumbies are the perfect example of how to turn your team around. They didn't sign stars, instead they went after solid players with potential and a coaching team that can guide the players to the promised land.
 

Bowside

Peter Johnson (47)
Also Ian prior from the brumbies is good enough to be playing super rugby but is stuck behind white. He is signed for next year but he is an option for 2014.
 
T

TOCC

Guest
Leading or lagging, that's a matter of debate in this context.

I don't see the applicable financial models and their time periods as you note as being 'vastly different' at all. Their core income source types are/were the same, and they both receive material grants from the ARU.

There's no 'insult' to Rugby WA in this. I didn't suggest that RWA was in imminent danger of collapse, rather that danger trends were mounting IMO. I was commenting on concerning financial and fan attendance trends. In this year' RWA Annual Report, the Chairman directly refers to a downturn in gate receipts in 2011 v 2010 and remember the S15 new structure added 2 more home games per season to each franchise as I recall. He also politely criticises the ARU for a significant reduction in its $ grant to RWA.

RugbyWA financial model is much stronger due to many reasons..

1. They don't have a facility like Ballymore sucking their finances, in fact they have a brand new training facility and corporate HQ will require minimal capital investment over the coming years
2. Comparatively the Force sponsorship base is stronger then the Reds in 2009
3. Strong membership base which has maintained a high retention rate the past 2 seasons
4. Sizeable cash assets
5. No debt or debt servicing(this is what broke the back of the QRU)

There is a difference between a financially striken organisation carrying large debts(aka the QRU), as opposed to a organisation like the Western Force who posted a trading profit of $400'000 in 2011 and has significant assets to their name.

RugbyWA can afford to have another few more bad years before they will need to consider turning to the ARU.
 

en_force_er

Geoff Shaw (53)
I think the fact Poey is captaining two Wallaby tests in the next 5 days would mean his Super rugby career would barely be on his mind.
 

ChargerWA

Mark Loane (55)
The only thing that I think could cause this to happen would be if the Force were targetting a coach who has advised them he is not willing to take the job, and Pocock isn't impressed with the other candidates.

Was hoping we would have heard a peep out of Cheika by now, just to know what he was thinking. Is he coming back to Aus? Does he want to coach in S15? Maybe Cheika is keeping his powder dry for a tilt at the Wallabies job?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top