....My strongest focus of criticism is on the Waratahs board. How a rugby team enjoying a monopoly position in the most wealthy city in the Southern Hemisphere, a city where the sport of the business community is rugby, doesn't dominate the Super competition is beyond me. On field our team does not come close to fulfilling its potential and from a business or financial perspective the franchise is a disaster.....It would appear that most of the board members are basically seat cushions, i.e., their sole function is to occupy chairs around the board table. Yet they blunder on, year after year. Where is the leadership; where are the drivers who will get things moving ahead? Why not get out of the road and let someone else have a go?
Bruce, your usual quality, and, as outsider now in QLD, but a 6 generation NSW-er by upbringing, I agree. Your analysis is but one of the reasons I moved to supporting the Reds up here. I grew to view the Tahs as fundamentally flawed gems, not a team that would improve and grow.
But another key dimension is sitting behind, or above, your astute assessment. Where is the self-praising ARU in all this? The State RUs are all de facto additionally funded by ARU grants and such like, and would not survive in any serious manner without them. The ARU, de facto or de jure, can exercise major influence over the State RUs by means of funds-flow power, should it choose to.
Why does the ARU, with all its strategising and vision-for-Australian-rugby declaring capacity, not far more forcefully intervene to use its monetary powers to drive far higher competency levels into the critical-to-game RUs? Look at where Aus teams are in aggregate in this year's S15, hardly an advertisement for leadership and coaching and business management quality. Look at where the QRU was allowed to end up 2004-09, and look at the truly shocking state of the ACTRU today. And the NSWRU is reportedly headed into more financial fragility with Tahs' 2011 income levels falling off badly.
For the ARU to declaim the talents of JO'N (as now renewed) and RD (to be renewed), etc, where is the structure, drive and execution from the ARU to ensure our local RUs become first-class leaders and developers for rugby in the relevant States? Ultimately, what is Australian national rugby if the State RUs are mediocre, or run in a mediocre manner? If the ARU should argue that it cannot determine the governance quality of the State RUs in any form (something I would hotly debate if they did so argue), then there is by definition something seriously flawed in the entire constitutional structure of Australian rugby, and such should become an urgent priority for major, immediate remedy.