• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies v Pumas - Saturday 17 September, nib Stadium Perth

Status
Not open for further replies.

gel

Ken Catchpole (46)
Keep circling the wagons, boys.

And from the usual suspects that are the first to call out provincial bias too.
 

Pfitzy

Nathan Sharpe (72)
You forgot Malcolm Roberts.


29512672.jpg
 

Dave Beat

Paul McLean (56)
Phipps is gone so that leaves Foley to hate on. When Cheika eventually sees the light it will turn to Mumm. Then Hooper. Then Folau.. ok maybe not, but you get the idea - TOO MANY FUCKING TAHS!

You'll be backing in Sir George Smith shortly because he's a red ;)
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
Foley won't be dropped, his ability to slot into 10 gave Cooper the space out wider on a number of occasions

FP I know it is conventional wisdom (or Cheika's) that we play two playmakers. But I don't recall any instance last week where the ball went through Foley's hands to Quade out wider. Isn't that what's supposed to happen to give Quade extra room to perform his magic?

Certainly, Foley was first receiver on a number of occasions but as I said above I don't think the ball went from Foley to Quade at all. But it certainly went through Quade's hands to an outside player (usually Kerevi) in space. I still want to see Quade/Kerevi at 10/12. Think with a bit of time under their belts, we could put the notion of two playmakers to bed for some time.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
As rank amateur armchair coach (with an opinion on everything of course - like all good posters on here) I did think Cheika has slightly lost the plot with some of his selections and was heading on the slow burn out as coach. But then some reflection.

Reality is Pooper at the moment is probably the best option we have as no clear 8 as front runner banging the door down. Next year will have to change and we might then have some better options with Holloway returning from injury. Not convinced Timani who has played lock for the Rebels is the real long term answer. I mean we are talking about the need for a specialist 8 yet we plump for a lock to play that position! How many of us have banged on about the perils of playing so many players out of position, yet we almost demand to play another player who has never played 8 to fill that gap. Seriously!

On Foley - I think he is get a lot of hate for his games this year at 10. Yep never thought I would say this but now Cooper seems better choice but lets not kid ourselves last year Foley was the better choice over Cooper and he generally proved this in tests last year which everyone agreed with. Lot of short term memory problems for many on this. Ok Cooper done better and now agree showing better option at 10. But does a couple of months of some ordinary games make Foley a bad player, and maybe, just maybe there are aspects to his game suited at 12. Ok first game at 12 pretty ordinary but last test whole lot better - not perfect of course but improving. His 7's pedigree seems to shine through a lot more at 12 so I actually can start to see what Cheika saw with the move. Funny that so Cheika might be better coach than the armchair amateur coach (critic) I am in picking the team. Who would have thought.

Hodge on the wing I did not necessarily see that but again seems maybe that might be ok move. And keeping Foley at 12 for the moment.

And replacing TK with Kerevi for my mind still so far been positive as when is the last time we saw TK lead on the run metres like Kerevi did in the last test?

Yes we would all like a world class wallabies team but there are not a lot of options, so maybe Cheika not doing as bad as we thought, as if we are pushing for players like Speight, Timani at lock, shows we almost acknowledge we are beret of finding other options ourselves. Some better options will emerge with the Rebels new Fijian wingers both eligible for the Wallabies, and players like Holloway returning from injury, and some settled locks in play for a bit it seems with Coleman, Douglas and Arnold as bench option.

A glass half full view for today. The half empty view I am sure will come after we are thrashed by the Argies over the weekend (and if the Argies play like they did for that first 50 minutes against the AB's I am very scared).
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
Lilo kicked better at Test level in his short stint. Shame about his super xv form. I'd argue Gits and even JOC (James O'Connor) were better, at least on par. Pretty close though so I don't strongly disagree.

It says a lot about our kickers though, if Foley has been our best in years. Another systemic problem in Aus rugby, lack of mentality from youngsters to improve on goal-kicking.

Not likely to improve at the next levels down either with goals in NRC worth only two points against 6 for a try. Goal kicking might fade from the Aus game altogether.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
Yes don't know why they are not picking more players from other provinces. Problem is you only have three other Super Rugby sides to choose from really.

I mean I applaud SANZAR for allowing that club side called the Queensland Reds to play in the Super Rugby competition this year as I am sure it was a great development opportunity for many of those club players involved. And for a bunch of club players I thought they did very well in the Super Rugby competition this year.

And if memory serves me correct I think they even actually just managed to finish above the Force. Which is just outstanding given they only are a club side.
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
Reality is Pooper at the moment is probably the best option we have as no clear 8 as front runner banging the door down. Next year will have to change and we might then have some better options with Holloway returning from injury. Not convinced Timani who has played lock for the Rebels is the real long term answer. I mean we are talking about the need for a specialist 8 yet we plump for a lock to play that position! How many of us have banged on about the perils of playing so many players out of position, yet we almost demand to play another player who has never played 8 to fill that gap. Seriously!

On Foley - I think he is get a lot of hate for his games this year at 10. Yep never thought I would say this but now Cooper seems better choice but lets not kid ourselves last year Foley was the better choice over Cooper and he generally proved this in tests last year which everyone agreed with.

Hodge on the wing I did not necessarily see that but again seems maybe that might be ok move. And keeping Foley at 12 for the moment.

And replacing TK with Kerevi for my mind still so far been positive as when is the last time we saw TK lead on the run metres like Kerevi did in the last test?

I'm pretty sure RN that Lopeti was more a No 8 before he went to Melbourne. IIRC that was where he was converted to lock. Perhaps one of the reasons we seem to have no backup at 8 is because someone like Timani hasn't been given a chance off the bench to show his wares. I like McMahon, but there have been times when we've had McCalman FGS at 6 or 8 when Timani could have been tried.

I wonder if Foley's apparent drop in form from last year is associated with his off-season stint in Japan. Has anyone come back to full form after no off-season? Honey Badger? Brown? Kaino (now back to form but after an extended lull).

Wing is not a bad place to blood Hodge at this level. Long term he will be closer to the action.

When was the last time we saw Kerevi lead the tackles made stats? Maybe the combination of most effective ball carrier (Kerevi) with the most effective defender (Kuridrani) is what we need.
 

Rugbynutter39

Michael Lynagh (62)
My mistake if Lopeti was more of a 8 b4 melboune rebels sojourn. Good point about Japan stint for Foley as yes not been a good track record there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top