• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Wallabies Number 8 for the RWC

Status
Not open for further replies.

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Isn't the RWC squad picked this Thursday? Palu won't have a chance to prove he's fit.

It will come down to doctors reports and fitness tests for a few, Mitchell looks on track "apparently" as well. They have all been in rehab camp and there will be some gambles
 

wamberal

Phil Kearns (64)
It will come down to doctors reports and fitness tests for a few, Mitchell looks on track "apparently" as well. They have all been in rehab camp and there will be some gambles

Picking a suspect player does not seem to carry many risks - apparently players who are genuinely injured can be substituted, even if the injury predates the tournament.
 
R

Richard D. James

Guest
A fit and firing Palu with Samo on the bench would be a massively powerful backrow. Pocock/Higgers/Palu then Pocock/Higgers/Samo, drool.
 

Scotty

David Codey (61)
I still think that if Palu can demonstrate he is fit, he will be selected.

He is the best test 8 we have by quite a way

So you'd throw a notoriously slow starter straight into a world cup when there are some credible alternatives?
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
So you'd throw a notoriously slow starter straight into a world cup when there are some credible alternatives?

"notoriously slow starter" dunno about that, he came out firing in the S15 this year, we are also a bit away from the tournament and there a number of pool games before it gets serious

If any of the guys covering 8 looked the business I would be less concerned.

Shit Higgers made two tackles and missing one; and two runs in 60 minutes.
http://www.rugbystats.com.au/matches/rugby/match10596.html

Compare that the week before where Macalman did 12 tackles, missing one and 6 runs in 56 minutes the week before and got panned .................
http://www.rugbystats.com.au/matches/rugby/match10595.html
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
Cliffy is cooked for mine. At least Rocky has had some lead up games to get fit and Mitchell played a fair chunk of the season (though I still think he's a huge risk). TPN has the runs on the board this season too, so to speak. Cliffy doesn't have any of that behind him, so I don't see how we can select him now. It's a bloody shame, but every world cup campaign has its hard luck stories. Ask guys like Tim Gavin and Toutai Kefu.
 

mark_s

Chilla Wilson (44)
My issue with Palu is that chances are he will get crocked again before the end of the tournament even if fit going in, same with TPN for that matter. Either way we need an alternative - we have that in Moore but haven't quite got it sorted yet at 8. I would like to see Samo start at 8 in Brisbane, have Higgers come on after say 50mins and ideally have TPN come on around the same time for Moore.
 

Elfster

Alex Ross (28)
Another thing with Higginbotham is that if Australia goes in with a 5/2 bench he could possibly cover a back position. If nothing else, in the backs he would be allowed to throw those dodgy passes. Actually you could probably say the same with Samo
 
C

chief

Guest
Apparently either Samo, McCalman or Palu will miss out. And I understand the predicament, knowing Deans he could very well drop Samo. But I still don't think it is wise to drop Australia's strongest S15 number 8 when the alternatives are a guy with a lot of talent ahead of him (McCalman) and a guy who can barely stay off his crutches (Palu). For me Samo should be included plus although Deans loves the "I have a young gun team" it really can't hurt with some experience. Samo who is 35 years old and has played for the Brumbies with success compared to a starting team who haven't won one major trophy until this year. You need some experience especially as Giteau seems to have been excluded from the starting side. For me when you need a proven performer you look no further than Samo who has form on his side. The others have talent but do they have what it takes, also Samo is pretty versatile.

As for Higginbotham I totally agree with TBH's point that he wasn't all that great. He definitely isn't a Number 8.

No doubt my Reds bias is shining lights throughout this post, and not for one second am I saying McCalman isn't fit for International Rugby. He's proven that he is indeed fit for it, but he's not going to have that IT factor which Samo and Palu provide. Particularly when we could be up against Read and Spies. I reckon leaving McCalman out will only make him better. As he has a lot of talent.
 

Scotty

David Codey (61)
"notoriously slow starter" dunno about that, he came out firing in the S15 this year, we are also a bit away from the tournament and there a number of pool games before it gets serious

If any of the guys covering 8 looked the business I would be less concerned.

Shit Higgers made two tackles and missing one; and two runs in 60 minutes.
http://www.rugbystats.com.au/matches/rugby/match10596.html

Compare that the week before where Macalman did 12 tackles, missing one and 6 runs in 56 minutes the week before and got panned .................
http://www.rugbystats.com.au/matches/rugby/match10595.html

He came out firing in S15, but I thought you wanted to talk about test number 8s? Big difference to come out firing in a test match.
 

Groucho

Greg Davis (50)
What are the chances of him doing that in the next few days? I think the risk is to high.

We can swap him out if he isn't fit, but we can't swap him in if he is, therefore we should name him in the squad.
 

vidiot

John Solomon (38)
We can swap him out if he isn't fit, but we can't swap him in if he is, therefore we should name him in the squad.

How easy is that? If you pick him and then say 'oh, he isn't fit' and then sub him out when he is no more or less fit this week than in a fortnight, it seems that naming sides on Thursday is no obstacle to replacing any player, and open to abuse.
 

Searsy

Herbert Moran (7)
I was thinking of all the number 8's that have played post Kefu and can think of 10 that have played in the last 10 years. I'm not sure how that compares to other positions but to me it seems like a lot. I think we have probably had a preferred number 8 for those periods but other have gotten a shot due to injury.

David Lyons
George Smith
Scott Fava
Radike Samo
Wycliff Palu
Rocky Elsom (if memory serves me correctly)
Stephen Hoiles
John Roe
Richard Brown
Scott Higginbotham

Out of the question, but out of curiosity, how is David Lyons travelling in the NH.
 

DPK

Peter Sullivan (51)
It's because number 8's come in many different styles. There's the blockbuster, like Cliff Palu or Kefu, the linkman like Rocky Elsom or Richard Brown, and then there the guys that play there when there's no room in the 6 or 7 jersey, like Smith and Higginbotham.
 

Cutter

Nicholas Shehadie (39)
We only have two 8s that provide the right balance to a backrow with Elsom and Pocock in it: Palu and Samo. Higginbotham is not an 8. He's demonstrated that for the Reds and now the Wallabies. It's a specialist position.

There are clearly too many backs and tight five players on these boards!
 

The_Brown_Hornet

John Eales (66)
Cutter, I've played all three positions in the back row! I think Higgers can play there, but needs to focus more on running closer to the ruck. I don't think the wide ranging game is that of a traditional 6 either. He's big enough, with good enough hands and a decent motor. I still think he's a better choice than Benny Mac at the moment.
 
G

gecko

Guest
We only have two 8s that provide the right balance to a backrow with Elsom and Pocock in it: Palu and Samo. Higginbotham is not an 8. He's demonstrated that for the Reds and now the Wallabies. It's a specialist position.

There are clearly too many backs and tight five players on these boards!

I'd like to see both in the side, neither is upto 80 minutes for mine, so Palu on for Samo late in the game would keep the intensity up.

Just think of this in a test, 20 minutes to go its neck and neck and we sub in TPN for Moore, Palu for Samo, Higgenbotham for Elsom and Vickerman for Sharpe. Say goodbye to the late game fade.
 
K

Keithy

Guest
How can the selectors be thinking of picking Palu who hasn't even played club rugby let alone a test match. Macalman can play lock as well as backrow.
 

Le Frog

Frank Row (1)
Forget Palu. Put in TPN at number 8, and keep Saia on the bench with a 5/2 split.

Can you imagine the carnage TPN would cause in defence and attack?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top