But the entire NZ coaching group you mean Mike Cron?Happy to be corrected but I believe JS and his entire NZ assistant coaching group are the first Wallabies coaches to be totally FIFO and kept their home bases in NZ.
Not sure how accurate that is, but I was told that by someone at RA over a year ago when they raised with me about not being overly confident that JS would be sticking around for the long term, along with his assistants.
I have read it somewhere in the press that when Joe goes Mike goes.But the entire NZ coaching group you mean Mike Cron?
Geoff Parling - Australian based
Eoin Toolin - Australian based
Laurie Fisher - Australian based
Mike Cron is at retirement age. Can't see him continuing on without Joe.
Completely agree, continuity should be key - although I don't necessarily worry about whether ROG or Cotter would be automatically less inclined to work with pre-existing assistants or Schmidt. Maybe they would be - but also maybe not.I think in the absence of a standout international candidate, you think about continuity. How can we keep the Schmidt infrastructure in place (assistants, high performance etc), while just changing the bloke at the top?
That's where the local candidates come in. None of them are inspiring but their strength is the ability to take the controls of a plane that's flying pretty well, and hopefully maintaining the course.
I'd worry with a ROG or Cotter we're back to finding new assistants and rebuilding the whole setup for the fourth time in as many years. That's just unsustainable.
so I say they pick the best candidate for head coach first and then worry about assistants afterwards.
Completely agree, continuity should be key - although I don't necessarily worry about whether ROG or Cotter would be automatically less inclined to work with pre-existing assistants or Schmidt. Maybe they would be - but also maybe not.
We've had the worlds longest case study of how when a coach leaves the wallabies job, we take a hit - and players are continually feeling like they're having to reapply for their standing in a squad, and learn completely new structures and systems that suddenly change over night.
The best candidate is the one who is willing to build on what Schmidt has put in place, and ideally work with him. This doesn't necessarily mean change nothing - no coach, even an incumbent - would be expected to roll out the same, identical approaches and philosophies year on year.
We need continuity, not our 9th fresh start
Yeah but O'Gara has no experience coaching a national team and only been a head coach at one club so experience isn't really there. And both Cotter's international stops weren't exactly great (especially Fiji)Ronan O'Gara or Vern Cotter?
Its always one step forward and one step back with these blokes. Although, in Waugh's defense, at least this isn't a 'captains call'.
Surely Cheika's last three years in charge of the Wallabies is enough to disqualify him?Yeah but O'Gara has no experience coaching a national team and only been a head coach at one club so experience isn't really there. And both Cotter's international stops weren't exactly great (especially Fiji)
Neither are as accomplished as Michael Cheika
This sounds like a recipe for disaster to meI think in the absence of a standout international candidate, you think about continuity. How can we keep the Schmidt infrastructure in place (assistants, high performance etc), while just changing the bloke at the top?
That's where the local candidates come in. None of them are inspiring but their strength is the ability to take the controls of a plane that's flying pretty well, and hopefully maintaining the course.
I'd worry with a ROG or Cotter we're back to finding new assistants and rebuilding the whole setup for the fourth time in as many years. That's just unsustainable.
Surely Cheika's last three years in charge of the Wallabies is enough to disqualify him?
This specifically would be a disaster - though I doubt this would be the case with Schmidt. Doesn't come across as the overbearing type and would probably understand what his role is - advice and guidance. The new coach can still be the coach, as you say.This sounds like a recipe for disaster to me
Would the coach have to call Schmidt every time he needs to make a decision? Would players actually listen to the coach if he's just essentially a Schmidt puppet
For me the coach has to be the coach. If Schmidt doesn't want to be the coach I don't think having him still looming over everything from another country is good for any coach coming in. The players need to know who's actually calling the shots
Eddie Jones also had a pretty impressive post Wallabies career, including his last appointment with England...His two years with Argentina are definitely the recent positive experience you'd cite as why he's a reasonable choice.
From the perspective of thinking we're appointing a coach to take us from the 2025 November internationals through to the end of the 2027 RWC, there are certainly worse options.
I wouldn't say so. I think he learned a lot from the ending last time and the fact he has continued to be successful after his last Wallabies stint shows thatSurely Cheika's last three years in charge of the Wallabies is enough to disqualify him?
Eddie was sacked by England after it turned toxic. Everything players have said around Cheika the last few years has been positiveEddie Jones also had a pretty impressive post Wallabies career, including his last appointment with England...
It's not so much Schmidt being opening overbearing, it's that everyone would still think he was running it regardless. I just feel it's an unfair position to put a coach inThis specifically would be a disaster - though I doubt this would be the case with Schmidt. Doesn't come across as the overbearing type and would probably understand what his role is - advice and guidance. The new coach can still be the coach, as you say.
Another complete clean out would be counter productive - as we've seen with (nearly) every single coaching transition since McQueen.
I don't see why this is an issue. Nor do I think it's an unfair position to be in. If he was a director of rugby - than maybe, but this isn't what is being reported as an option. It's a possible consultancy role, and if that's the case - the new coach would (should, devil would be in the detail of course) retain the final decision makers across all things team.It's not so much Schmidt being opening overbearing, it's that everyone would still think he was running it regardless. I just feel it's an unfair position to put a coach in
Sounds like there will be a clean out regardless. Cron is off and probably Lord bucket hat too, so we are going to be filling a few positions I think