No Queenslanders there, I notice.Our lineout also recently disintegrated with Frost, Arnold, Leota, Hooper and Valetini on the field.
But there's that good coach caveat
Yeah - maybe. I mean if one of your best players has 2-3 successive 6 months injuries (Bell for example) you’d still pick him, right? I do think the fact Skelton rarely jumps is an issue but everything’s a trade off. We could certainly benefit from his work with the defensive maul.I think people are wildly overstating how much other selections would change or how much our game plan would change on the basis of selecting Skelton.
In my view it only limit you from selecting a Pooper type combination in the backrow which is clearly not at all on the horizon because we no longer have an issue where our best two forwards are both 7s.
If I recall last year there was a test where I think we played Frost & Skelton together. And I think we just threw to Frost all game lifted by Skelton and it was fine.And correct me if I'm wrong, but both Valetini and Wilson seemed to be used more as jumpers in the last test; Wilson almost as a primary target. So, (say) Frost and Wilson (or Cale as replacement) as the primary targets, Valetini as third jumper and Skelton himself as a surprise. Would it work?
It would have either been the game where we got flogged by South Africa, or the one where we were flogged by New ZealandIf I recall last year there was a test where I think we played Frost & Skelton together. And I think we just threw to Frost all game lifted by Skelton and it was fine.
The reality is that Skelton, at LaR, is a part of arguably the strongest pack in world club rugby playing forwards-dominated rugby. He carries, he links, he's a cog in a powerful machine. A game the Wallabies simply don't - and probably can't - play. Comparing him to the likes of Retallick is pointless. He's a lock in name only.Derpus is right, if we play Skelton we have to be all in. We need to adjust the team to accommodate his strengths and weaknesses. The fact he plays OS means we don’t have him all the time, so do we change our game plan around him when he’s available? Or find a Skelton style giant (there’s not many out there) to keep a consistent game plan?
I think people are wildly overstating how much other selections would change or how much our game plan would change on the basis of selecting Skelton.
In my view it only limit you from selecting a Pooper type combination in the backrow which is clearly not at all on the horizon because we no longer have an issue where our best two forwards are both 7s.
Some time between now and at 12pm on the 8th of August.When is TRC squad announced?
Of course he is. Look at our stock currently. Skelton being talked down in our landscape seems crazy when Blyth is currently a Wallaby lock. Theyve won their games which is great but you can't tell me big Will isnt an upgrade if available. Other options looked over like Swain who is a walking brain fart and Rodda who's made of glass. Skelton is the type of big man we need in a pack to take on the top sides and the Lions.I think that the selections we have available, and likely to select, no longer make a big impediment on bringing Big Will back. I don't know his form, or his desire, but I do think he is a serious option in 2024.
The other bit about Skelton is the work he does in support and offloading. His hands are pretty good and he try assists on several occasions I have watched him play. Another thing about him is his strength in the tight, It is fine having a good front row but they aren't doing much if the pressure behind them is poor.Of course he is. Look at our stock currently. Skelton being talked down in our landscape seems crazy when Blyth is currently a Wallaby lock. Theyve won their games which is great but you can't tell me big Will isnt an upgrade if available. Other options looked over like Swain who is a walking brain fart and Rodda who's made of glass. Skelton is the type of big man we need in a pack to take on the top sides and the Lions.
It's wild that we don't even know when they are naming their squadWhen is TRC squad announced?
Bloody poor by the poor marketing team.Do we just assume that the squad has just continued as it currently was and they are already in camp?
I wouldn't think reading a squad list would make people incapable of watching the Olympics. If this is seriously the reason RA need to give their head's a wobbleI assume they don't want to take any attention away from our women's efforts.
We're also presuming that no-one internally has been told if they're in/out.I wouldn't think reading a squad list would make people incapable of watching the Olympics. If this is seriously the reason RA need to give their head's a wobble
It was reported in the Nine papers on July 21 that the squad would be announced in about "two weeks"...
That would seem to align up with the squad being announced likely later this week after the 7's is completed.
I assume they don't want to take any attention away from our women's efforts.
If consideration of the 7s were the reason for delaying the squad announcement, I'd assume it would be simply to stretch out the pipeline of rugby media by another week, as opposed to overshadowing the brilliant performance.I wouldn't think reading a squad list would make people incapable of watching the Olympics. If this is seriously the reason RA need to give their head's a wobble