Strewthcobber
Simon Poidevin (60)
These guys have contracts. Why shouldn't they get paid.
Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk
They should.
But the players want to be released to go get paid more OS don't they?
These guys have contracts. Why shouldn't they get paid.
Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk
I read somewhere that Holmes wants to go, but hope not!
Will Tomane be fit? If he is not fit for TRC, is there any point keeping him on the books purely for the EOYT considering he is going overseas? Speight, Naiyaravoro and Naivalu will all be available for the EOYT with Horne & Folau, and then in Europe you would have AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), Mitchell & Beale as covers as they are a) nearby & b) eligible 60+
Don't let TPN leave!
Could you release Pocock as he is 60+ and could simply just choose to stay anyway?
Should release Gill otherwise the Reds are having to fork out a hell of a lot of money for maybe an NRC appearance or 2.
Forgot about that. On that basis he won't be needed by the Wallabies.
I don't know exactly what happens regarding his contract. Presumably he keeps getting paid by the Brumbies until he is healthy enough to start his new contract overseas.
Sent from my HTC_PN071 using Tapatalk
Gills on mor ethen a couple hundred, and its not a couple months, its 5.
Once they get released here, they are fully the responsibility of their new club (medicals, salary etc)
I'd be letting Gill (unfortunately excess) and Tomane & Beale (injured) go, but keeping TPN & Holmes. Not phased either way with To'omua
Gills on mor ethen a couple hundred, and its not a couple months, its 5.
I have no idea what Gill is on but for a Super Rugby only contract it is hard to see it being much more than $300k given the minimum contract levels and the salary cap.
By a couple of months I meant that if he was kept around it would likely be for some or all of the Rugby Championship, not until the conclusion of his contract on 31 December.
Is a players contract finish at the end of the calendar year?
Do Super players have to play NRC (included in contract) for no EXTRA money
Have been collating the data for the Aussie Front Rowers and it's not pretty as far as choices for Wallabies selection and work rates compared to our key oppositions.
For some time now I've been highlighting that our Front Rowers have a focus on the set piece and have little involvement around the park. Is this the lack of fitness that Cheika is talking about?
View attachment 8203View attachment 8204
Some similar stats for the ABs regular Front Rowers at the RWC.
View attachment 8205
In the RWC Final the ABs Front Row made 42% of the ABs Total Ruck Involvements and 35% of the Defence Ruck Involvements.
The same numbers for the Wallabies Front Row were 29% and 16%.
Note: Dane Coles has more of a roving brief and is often used as a ball carrier within 5m of the side line. He may have few Ruck Involvements but he's very effective.
The Wallabies Front Rowers had the following averages at the RWC.
View attachment 8206
View attachment 8207
These stats show that some of our players provide a higher work rate in Test rugby than in Super Rugby.
Key Ruck Involvements from England FRs from June Tests:
Mark Vunipola - 16 Total - 11 Attack - 5 Defence
Dylan Hartley - 30 Total - 26 Attack - 4 Defence
Dan Cole - 22 Total - 16 Attack - 6 Defence.
FF (Folau Fainga'a)
Tanks for that - brilliant work but
You forgot Scott Sio in the Super Tables
and do we add Slips together
Forcefan.
Do the stats indicate a different style or game plan that is influencing the ruck involvements? I am wondering who is doing the work to cover the front rowers and what impact it has on attacking options / structures etc.
Sombre reading @forcefan. I thought the all black effort in the final wad an outlier and not normal?
Sent from my D5833 using Tapatalk