A minimal top up money actually has to be spent doesn't it? As it's agreed to by the RUPA.
BH
Do you have to rep Australia for 2 years before a top up is offered.
I know that was the case.
Pulver in 2014I thought the ARU kicked in some money initially but I can't imagine that will still be the case in 2017.
Pulver in 2014
“In the case of Karmichael Hunt, we have him on an Australian agreement working in tandem with Queensland Rugby Union.
To be fair, they got a fair chunk of it back when he paid his drug fineWell, to date that's been a waste ?
To be fair, they got a fair chunk of it back when he paid his drug fine
Should have added aMate - he was only fined $2,000.
But I think the Reds recouped a bit of their share from his contract
I wonder if the ARU top-up is only offered when the Super Rugby contract is being negotiated. Limits the potential recipients for this year even more..
Props
Slipper, Sio, Kepu
Hookers
Moore
Locks
Simmons, Douglas
Back Row
Hooper, Fardy, McCalman
Halfbacks
Phipps
Fly halves
Foley, Cooper
Centres
Leali'ifano, Kuridrani
Wing/Fullback
Folau, Horne
You've surely got to be selective. If the player is going to be in your final 30 man squad you don't release them. There's no point cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Holmes, To'omua and probably Joe Tomane would be the three you certainly wouldn't be releasing. TPN and Pocock won't be released. They'll be in the matchday 23.
You probably would release Gill because it doesn't seem likely he'd be in your final squad.
I read somewhere that Holmes wants to go, but hope not!
Will Tomane be fit? If he is not fit for TRC, is there any point keeping him on the books purely for the EOYT considering he is going overseas? Speight, Naiyaravoro and Naivalu will all be available for the EOYT with Horne & Folau, and then in Europe you would have AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper), Mitchell & Beale as covers as they are a) nearby & b) eligible 60+
Don't let TPN leave!
Could you release Pocock as he is 60+ and could simply just choose to stay anyway?
Should release Gill otherwise the Reds are having to fork out a hell of a lot of money for maybe an NRC appearance or 2.
I'd guess Tomane will be in the Rugby Championship squad.
They won't release anyone they actually want to select even if it meant they could select them as a 60+ test player under Reg 9 or whatever it is. That would be an unnecessary cause of bad blood to effectively end someone's contract early so someone else can start paying for them.
Whilst the ARU are keen to save costs, they have shown that they are likely to keep more players around than necessary if the coach thinks they are any chance of being selected for the Wallabies.
I'm thinking more about the franchises.
I'd be pretty shitty if I was the Reds and I had to keep paying Gill a couple hundred grand more just coz Cheika wants him to go to Wallaby Camps to be the 4th string option
I'd guess Tomane will be in the Rugby Championship squad.
Forgot about that. On that basis he won't be needed by the Wallabies.Tomane broke his Tibia last week, had surgery and is gone for about 2 months. So he could maybe recover in time to play SA or possibly that match in London against the Argies.