Higginbotham for centre!!!
That's the elephant in the room.
Higginbotham for centre!!!
That's the elephant in the room.
I would be happy if the eliphant could distribute.
The big difference is at the collision in both defence and attack. In Defence the all blacks made more dominant tackles and therefore were able to take the space past the ball, by dropping the wallaby and themselves down into it and slowing the ball. In attack the all black ball runners were winning the contact contest and again taking the space past the ball ensuring momentum. It is only this that separates the teams IMO. Give Genia and Cooper the All Black forwards and see what the result may be.
It seems only a few weeks ago that people were criticising AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper)'s ability to act as a distributing centre.
Higginbotham for centre!!!
He kicks too much.
Typical scrum-fetishist's bullshit. The Wallabies scrum was fine; we got clean ball off our feed and didn't get pushed around on theirs. Our front row popped up once; theirs was penalised at least three times for botching the hit.
Kepu popped at least once. Alexander at least three times. The entire front row at least once. You never once went forward. They did, every time. The penalties were 2-1, and wrong, because Joubert missed the bind. After all; why would a loosehead try to take it down when he goes forward each time it stays up?
That's not even holding par. I am a scrum fetishist. That means I know what's happening in there, and you got munched. Telling yourself you didn't is whistling past the graveyard.
And if you disagree, gives links to the scrums, and I'll take you through them and show how.
As long as Robbie keeps picking a guy who makes Ronan O'Gara look like Henry Honniball, you'll just have to grin and bear it.
Bollocks they went forward every time. A number of scrums went exactly nowhere. Even the Kiwis on the Fern conceded Crockett had a poor game. The Wallaby scrum didn't dominate, but for the most part neither was it munched. Their bench was much better, and they got clear ascendancy then, I will concede.Kepu popped at least once. Alexander at least three times. The entire front row at least once. You never once went forward. They did, every time. The penalties were 2-1, and wrong, because Joubert missed the bind. After all; why would a loosehead try to take it down when he goes forward each time it stays up?
That's not even holding par. I am a scrum fetishist. That means I know what's happening in there, and you got munched. Telling yourself you didn't is whistling past the graveyard.
And if you disagree, gives links to the scrums, and I'll take you through them and show how.
That makes it ok to take him out illegally? I think the infamous Kiwi sense of entitlement has been roused again.
And if you disagree, gives links to the scrums, and I'll take you through them and show how.
No more wishful than you proclaiming your view as unassailably correct, despite others viewing the same scrums disagreeing with you, including Joubert. Funny thing, they could have done more. Why didn't they?Cyclo; when the loosehead stands up the tighthead twice in the first half-hour, that looshead is getting munched. Moreover, he has no interest in taking it down from there.
They did a number on your scrum. They could have done more; that scrum five, for example. You did not get parity. You did not once drive them backwards. They drove you backwards time and again. I'm sorry to rain on your parade, but this is coming from the Fox commentators who were proclaiming being driven back on the right as a right shoulder; it's wishful thinking.
We give with one hand, take away with the other.