• Welcome to the forums of Green & Gold Rugby.
    We have recently made some changes to the amount of discussions boards on the forum.
    Over the coming months we will continue to make more changes to make the forum more user friendly for all to use.
    Thanks, Admin.

Springboks v Wallabies - Sunday 2 October 1am AEST - Loftus Versfeld

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dalai Ninja

Ward Prentice (10)
If we are importing mick Byrnes international credentials then we are about 20-0 in front! Well, maybe there's a loss or two in there but we are well in front

That why we got him. :)

But I was thinking more about the discussion about whether Reece Hodge knows the ball flies further at altitude. I think we can be certain Byrnes will tell him, if Larkham forgets.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Mumm? Runs Harder then timani ?

Sent from my SM-G928I using Tapatalk


No, but is a better all round 6 or 8 than Timani whose only success in super rugby has been as a short lock who trucks it up and tackles.

The concept of timani having to make actual rugby decisions at 8 (or 6) in a test match, yeah nah, I don't see it

The decision was between Fardy and Mumm.
 

waiopehu oldboy

George Smith (75)
Mumm over Fardy again.
Did Michael Cheika catch Scott Fardy flirting with his wife? Because that is the only reason I can think of for cheika prefering Dean Mumm. It cannot be the lineout because Rob Simmons isn't getting picked for anything other than lineout management.
Surely Fardy offers more at the breakdown as well, which could be timely with Dave Pocock out

Posted by Pedrolicious in the blog preview but too good not to share:

image.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: TSR

dru

David Wilson (68)
If the Wallabies don't win this test at Loftus, they wont win there ever. Its the weakest Springbok side I have ever seen on paper.

Maybe we need another heavy loss , just for AC to sort of realize he is on the road to nowhere.

I'm not so sure PaarlBok. Not the strongest hooker, and. Mtawiira is not at his peak. WB ahead in the scrum.

I'm sorry for the Lions halves, but with a very obvious shift to territory/ kicking its a pretty determined statement with Steyne and Lambie starting. Steyne may be aging, but a steadier hand at the tiller would be hard to find. It'll be interesting to watch Paige. Our halves are better at what they do. Yours are better at the Springbok thing.

Strategy will tell.

The line out is clearly better for Boks though Aus are improving.

There is no way I'm calling a big win either way.
 

Scrubber2050

Mark Ella (57)
Amusing really that the All Blacks who are playing excellent rugby make 4 changes this week and we, who are playing at a mediocre level make 1 forced change, being McMahon for the injured Poey.

Interesting take on different coaches attitudes to long term success
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
Amusing really that the All Blacks who are playing excellent rugby make 4 changes this week and we, who are playing at a mediocre level make 1 forced change, being McMahon for the injured Poey.

Interesting take on different coaches attitudes to long term success


They have rested key players.

You have in no way suggested that the Wallabies do that. Your suggestions have been around making positional changes and/or picking the players you prefer.
 

Hawko

Tony Shaw (54)
Amusing really that the All Blacks who are playing excellent rugby make 4 changes this week and we, who are playing at a mediocre level make 1 forced change, being McMahon for the injured Poey.

Interesting take on different coaches attitudes to long term success


NZ are very careful to avoid burnout and regularly rotate players to ensure their workloads are managed. As some on this site will tell you, this is a really stupid thing to do and obviously one of the reasons their recent record is so bad.
 

fatprop

George Gregan (70)
Staff member
Amusing really that the All Blacks who are playing excellent rugby make 4 changes this week and we, who are playing at a mediocre level make 1 forced change, being McMahon for the injured Poey.

Interesting take on different coaches attitudes to long term success


Not really, one has seemingly infinite depth of outstanding talent and the other is the Wallabies
 

Braveheart81

Will Genia (78)
Staff member
NZ are very careful to avoid burnout and regularly rotate players to ensure their workloads are managed. As some on this site will tell you, this is a really stupid thing to do and obviously one of the reasons their recent record is so bad.


It's a great luxury to have when you have such depth and have been winning constantly.

After only two wins this year people would be calling for Cheika's head if he decided to rest Hooper, Genia, Coleman and Kerevi for example.
 

Scrubber2050

Mark Ella (57)
It's a great luxury to have when you have such depth and have been winning constantly.

After only two wins this year people would be calling for Cheika's head if he decided to rest Hooper, Genia, Coleman and Kerevi for example.


It's not the 2 wins this year but the 5 losses that concern me, but I do take your point on depth.
Good example is the way Chek has been "resting" or "rotating" the locks:)
 

Lindommer

Simon Poidevin (60)
Staff member
I'd suggest "finding my best locks/second row combination" would be closer to what Chek's been doing this year.
 

Lindommer

Simon Poidevin (60)
Staff member
A careful search back through my posts would confirm that, JB. I've been calling for Coleman to get a gold callup for a coupla years now.
 

Scrubber2050

Mark Ella (57)
A careful search back through my posts would confirm that, JB. I've been calling for Coleman to get a gold callup for a coupla years now.


True Lindo.

Its a bit like cream, sometimes it takes a while to rise to the surface (and generally it is worth the wait, as with Coleman)
 

Twoilms

Trevor Allan (34)
Coleman is alright but he's not exactly at Itoje levels. The difference between him and Arnold is slim.
 

Brumby Runner

Jason Little (69)
Coleman and Arnold are really dissimilar in the way they play. Coleman is more aggressive and will challenge the line with ball in hand. Arnold is perhaps more skillful as a distributor and is more creative in attack. Both are good to excellent defenders, and both offer very good lineout skills. I just think they are not directly competing with each other for a position, but are each in competition with others. In time, Arnold/Coleman just might be the best locking combination we have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top