Obviously there will be exceptions, short-term exigencies, emergencies, and so on. However, it seems pretty obvious that we are all in a relatively small boat as rugby supporters in Australia. This small boat has potential, as we see when an Australian team makes the semi-final of the World Cup and the ratings soar.
To keep this small boat afloat in a very competitive marketplace, let alone to enable it grow, will take some tough decisions and, dare I say, some medium term pain.
Frankly, I would say bugger off, Kurtley. You are Australia's #1 full-back. Play there, improve your game.
Barnes is a different case. He is clearly suited to either 10 or 12, and should be allowed to play either position ( and, indeed, some would argue that most players who are competent in one of these postions should be able to play ther other). But my point stands, the Wallabies coach (or his delegate) should be empowered to consult with the Super Rugby coaches to ensure that players are played in the positions that suit the national interest, not the short-term interests of a Super Rugby franchise.
This is one reason that privatisation of Super Rugby franchises is - perhaps - not a good thing for the overall health, and growth of the game.
When the Wallabies are strong, we have a chance. The Reds winning this year is a momentary bonus. The Wallabies are the main game.
