Any steps that are taken to "equalise" the distribution of playing strength will have to be strictly on a voluntary basis. That will never happen, until it is too late.
Chicken and egg, mate. As Paul Keating so famously said, and I paraphrase, if you want to know which horse will win, back self-interest.
The only thing that will unite the various parties is the threat of the gallows. And even then, I suspect that the stronger clubs would keep on pursuing their own selfish interests until the bitter end.
People can gabble on about the grass roots until the cows come home. The simple fact remains, the rich cows will graze in green pastures, and the poor ones can go to buggery. The grass roots exist, of course, but they are not evenly distributed, and they do thrive, again, only in certain areas. What else do people expect? Magic fertiliser from above?
At the end of the day, any sort of bureaucratic load is just not what any of the clubs need.
If only we could afford, and could accept, a "Commissioner" who is given the power to make arbitrary decisions for the good of the competition as a whole. The Yanks seem to be able to tolerate this sort of dictatorship in their flagship sports.
The player points system was meant to spread the love, and there appears to be a more even distribution in 1st grade recently. But it's not just the clubs, players need to be willing to travel to Penrith to play, and that's bound to encounter resistance
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of both Dave, but I see that as the SSs role now..developing players for higher honours. I really hate the lack of opportunities in Australian Rugby forcing players OS but I suppose a SS contract won't pay the billsA more even distribution, maybe, maybe not - it was a great season last year. Do you think the levelingout was atune to spreading talent, Or the stronger clubs not getting all their layers of super players back becuase; 1. all the super teams followed the brumbies lead and now keep there players local. 2. the soup and shute finishing close to the same time and now dumping of super talent into clubs. We have also lost a number of very strong premier rugby players off shore,
The owners generally don't appoint people they went went to school with
Who actually has any governance over SS? Do NSWRU have any say, or is it just SRU? Seems to be one of the big issues, to me.
Couple of things,
Firstly the issue is really how to help the Riff to be competitive. As a comp, the SS is strong. Last years Premiers were 11/18 in the regular season, so that's hardly dominant.
Secondly, the comp is still largely amateur, if it's determined that a local Rats players has to transfer to the Riff for the good of the comp, he's more likely to find an alternative to the SS. So SRU directed transfers won't work.
As you rightly point out, the solution requires the goodwill of all the clubs, so it is a bit like herding cats.
And when I said expertise, I should have said credibility.
Don't understand your proposition.
Surely any organisation assisting someone to undertake study has little to do with the uni. They should be grateful for any supported students sent their way.
And most Unis (if not all) run elite athlete programs to assist athletes in whatever sport with their studies.
Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk
I am well acquainted with that club.I think you'll find that UWS already have a rugby club, which runs 4 grades and colts and plays out of the old Hawkesbury Agricultural College (now part of UWS) at Richmond. http://uwshawkesbury.rugby.net.au/
The lack of connection to SS is a blight on RA imo. It’s the largest contributor to professional rugby in Australia and there would appear to be a badically non-existant communication path let alone organisational structure. I still struggle with the concept that “grass roots = shute shield” but if RA cant connect at least that far what hope is there?I think it's just the SRU which is made up of the 12 club presidents (from which they elect a SRU President and Vice President or possibly 2 VPs for the season to run things between monthly meetings).
I am well acquainted with that club.
My suggestion was more along the lines that the Powers that be, let's say it's RA, as they at least have a cheque book, that they fund some scholarships for struggling clubs. For rugby talented school leavers wanting to play and study.
They would have to be pretty attractive, but it would be a way to strengthen the colts program at struggling clubs.
Wouldn't really matter where the recipients choose to study. But UWS might be logical to partner with.
Sent from my MHA-L09 using Tapatalk
I think the best way to do it is have a player pool. AR or whoever is in charge of this theoretical chequebook identifies the top 50-100 players for colts and then grade. These players are then tiered in two divisions tier one, say top 15 then tier two the rest. These players are then able to nominate themselves to the player pool if they feel so inclined, if they are tier 2 they get x amount of $$ if they are tier 1 they get a different x amount of $$. The bottom 6 clubs from the previous year then enter a draft and are able to draft these player pool players into their team while AR pick up the bill
Except that the ARU apparently doesn't have any spare cash.
I have not seen any decisions.
Except that the ARU apparently doesn't have any spare cash.