As an old timer I should be disturbed about the recent info about player payments at the club level, and the objections to it, but I'd like to see how it pans out.
About a month ago I wrote that finding a couple of Kevin Maloneys would do wonders for rugby west of the inner city. For the few that don't know: Maloney, who heads the Tulla Mining Group, has been connected with the club for a while and is their main sponsor. He is also a sponsor of the Reds.
It was taken the wrong way - as though I thought Maloneys were growing on trees and that I thought that clubs were not trying to find sugar daddies unless I told them. I just meant it would do wonders out west.
My point was that the status quo was not working and that Sydney rugby would limp along and not change doing the same old things in the amateur way. I expressed a wish, maybe in that post, but if not in earlier ones, and without purporting to know how to do it, that strong rugby outposts should be established away from the inner city.
If one of the ways of creating outposts and getting out of the amateur way of doing things is to attract long term sponsors to fund player recruitment I'm willing to see that strategy develop. I know the downside of it and that some clubs will lose players as we see happening now at the Rats, Rebels and Highlanders, but change has casualties. I also know that players don't change clubs (or stay at clubs) just for more money ** and appreciate the great side of amateur rugby more than most.
As an aside to my main point: there are too many teams in the Sydney comp yet I'd like to see it expanded with clubs from the Illawarra and Newcastle plus a couple more to make two divisions of 8, with teams subject to promotion and relegation. There are dangers here, especially if the very clubs west of the inner city that we want to build up are disadvantaged by this, but safeguards can be built in.
To be honest I have forgotten why the two division system in Sydney club rugby was disbanded, unless it was just political. Maybe the reasons for not having it are still valid, but in this semi-professional age of club rugby maybe we have to go back to the future. I can pick holes in my suggestions too, but some different things are needed, or at least attempted, even if they fail.
** see next post on this matter.