I am shocked Ready did not get a spot, I thought he was primed to get back to the big time and it raises an interesting question about the NRC teams being owned by the Reds, he was captain of the Brisbane City team. Is he such a good captain that his skills do not matter? Seems odd that you can captain a "feeder" team to the Reds and not get a spot in the team.
Yeah this is indeed odd. I would have gone with Ready in the starting XV but I do see the logic behind starting BPA, and I totally get Mafi being the designated 16 (I expect him to be the 16 for most the season) he's safe as houses.
I am not convinced with the Korczyk at 7 move, I am still probably stuck in the past but would prefer a 7 who can pilfer..maybe we should have Ready at 7, he steals more ball. Seriously though I would have Wright starting at 7.
In the trials Korczyk showed a lot more on ball work, and I think balances that out with his motor around the park, I think the only player who I am
sure worked harder on the field than Korczyk last year was George Smith.
I actually think Timu is the biggest question mark at this point, he killed it in NRC and was impressive when he came in for Super last year, but in the tirl games hasn't really shown all that much.
I would rather see Stewart in the starting 15, don't really mind if it is at 10 or 15, I see Lance and Stewart as equals at 10 and 15 but see more of an upside to the future with Stewart at 10. He needs opportunities to get his hands on the ball.
Yeah, I 100% agree on this one, I ideally wanted Stewart at 10 and Cooper at 15 (as Quades defence doesn't matter much when he's at 15), this way Stewart gets to see and be guided to improve the weakest part of his game, from someone who is still one of the best playmakers going around; Stewart - Lance at 10/15 would have been my choice too.
If you are looking at our back 3, I think this also improves our back 3 substantially. We can actually kick the ball from our back 3, we could play Toua on the wing, and likely had CFS cover the 11/13/14 spots from the bench.
CFS at 14 concerns me, I would not even have him in my 23, too many chances and not enough proof of his ability. If NRC form is what gets him a spot then apply it across the squad.
CFS did play really well in the NRC he looks to be a changed player, I did see enough evidence for him being a Super level player. Although it is curious that Daugunu who was the leading try scorer in the NRC and pretty much every time
It concerns me that it looks like we are (for this one datapoint, I am likely reading far too much into this) relying on older guys on short contracts, particularly the journeymen/mercenary type, if this is the case we have a fundamentally flawed approach to Rugby. I understand we probably didn't have the money to go out and
get players like some of the other Super teams.*Guys like Lance, Lucas, Nabuli, Toua, Douglas, JP Smith aren't going to be the answer. Those guys should be coming in to plug a hole, do a specific job. They should only be starting until we can find a way to get our future on the field. Tupou, Hoopert, Blyth, Hockings, Rodda, Tui, Timu, Korczyck, ASY (Angus Scott-Young), Wright; Tuttle, Stewart, Paia'aua, Perese, Daugunu; those guys are our future, they are who we need to be building our team around. Not Jono Lance and Aidan Toua (as much as I do like both of them).
* How did Melbourne afford it given they have no sponsors... oh wait the ARU will just bail them out! But seriously, anyone got any idea how Melbourne pulled that one off or are they just going to be a financial black hole?