There's some weight to this argument, but I don't know that Quade has the runs on the board to make this argument. He was wonderful for the Reds in 2011 and had some great games for the Wallabies in 2010, although I would argue that Beale's sublime form was as much a factor in the team's attacking play then. But Quade has not really kicked on since then. Flashes of brilliance, but much longer spells of mediocrity. This may, in part, be a result of the game plan, but game plans don't make plays kick poorly, drop balls, and throw interceptions. So I'd be more sympathetic to Quade wanting the team built around and playing his style if he'd had some more recent dividends.
That is the problem with Quades comments, his fire maybe accurate, but the position form which he is firing ain't the best. The Reds seem to have been able to build a team and a style of play around him and Genia and it is working for them all. His knee injury certainly hasn't helped his cause, so next year will be important for him.
Deans on the other hand seems to be coming up with a game plan that doesn't take into account the strengths and weaknesses of the play maker or indeed most of the team. He seems to have a one plan fits all approach for the team and the 10, and that plan seems to revolve around McCabe.
The thing I find perplexing with the Wallabies isn't just Cooper specific. Why is it players, who had stella S15 seasons, showed good execution and basic skills in the S15 season, suddenly lose their mojo when they play for the Wallabies.
I also don't understand why we have a coach who would rather pick players out of position be it for injury cover or not, then pick players who had outstanding S15 seasons in those positions. Shipperley should have been on the wing not AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) and that goes right back to the Welsh series. AAC (Adam Ashley-Cooper) maybe a better player than Shipperley, but he isn't a better winger.
I honestly think it is Deans who is holding back the development of the Wallabies and the players at International level. There are too many players who range from Good to Excellent at S15 level who play average at test level, for it to be a stepping up to the next level issue. Too many players who are average at S15 Level are being selected for the Wallabies.
To me, the biggest problem for the Wallabies is Deans selecting players out of position, instead of picking the best players in their positions. By selecting players out of position, too much time for the Wallabies is spent on players learning a different position when they should be working on building combinations and familiarity. By selecting players out of position, those guys are having to devote too much brain space to do the postional things that come natural to the guys who play those positions week in week out.