don't they fly business class, yeah totally brutal, especially when they don't have those silk socks you love.
Apparently there weren't enough DVT socks to go round and people got upset.
don't they fly business class, yeah totally brutal, especially when they don't have those silk socks you love.
The incident, which has been referred to the Australian Rugby Union's integrity unit for investigation, culminated in Patston's departure from Buenos Aires two days' later, with coach Ewen McKenzie missing Wallabies training to escort Patston to the airport on Tuesday afternoon.
The incident, which has been referred to the Australian Rugby Union's integrity unit for investigation, culminated in Patston's departure from Buenos Aires two days' later, with coach Ewen McKenzie missing Wallabies training to escort Patston to the airport on Tuesday afternoon.
RUPA should only be involved in long term disciplinary actions.Suggest that RUPA gets involved early on this one, particularly after the ignorant way the ARU handled the Dublin matter without them.
Integrity applies at all levels, not just with players.
thats weird in itself - don't you think?
She's not a member of the technical or coaching staff.
Am I the only one who thinks it must be serious for Link to miss training in the week prior to a test?
Maybe Link wanted the opportunity for some one on one time to get her side of the story in full in case it had an impact on his decisions for the remaining few days of the tour.
Sure. But even then he's got a man management issue coming into a very important game if he's seen to be siding (even if only to get her story) with a non-player.
I know I'm jumping to conclusions but it suggests to me it must have been reasonably serious.
It could be a bit the other way though.
Obviously the situation is swayed somewhat by the fact we have a test on Saturday and To'omua is potentially injured. On that basis there is a greater desire to keep a player on the tour that in a perfect world might have been sent home immediately.
Maybe Link's reaction to the incident was that he didn't think it was that serious and subsequently he was a) keeping KB (Kurtley Beale) on tour and b) planning to select him but he wanted to confirm things with the staff member going home and potentially reassure her that the incident wasn't being ignored.
So much conjecture and so little information at this stage. It's certainly a strange series of events.
As usual its hard to punch holes in your analysis...but ...
I would hope that whatever our situation if it warranted it he would not be allowed to play just because we cannot really afford to lose the game and we might be in the shit without him.
Thats probably a triumph of hope over experience given the Dublin response.
I agree with that IS. I just hope this is dealt with impartially, swiftly and based on upholding certain standards, not this week's game.
They acted swiftly to cut JOC (James O'Connor) loose, I'd lose a lot of respect for Link is he favoured Beale/Patston in any way due to their history.
In what way does it seem that if the incident was really serious he would have put his foot down and Beale would have come home?
By what he says,or by what he does?
A vast difference in how the abs approached the Cruden matter and this.
From previous events?From previous events.
Surely the fact that McKenzie has kept Beale with the side provides an indication that the incident isn't extremely serious. That said, given his disciplinary record, this specific incident might not be serious enough to warrant sending him home immediately but it could easily make the ARU decide that offering a contract for 2015 isn't something they continue with.
In the cold light of day - particularly after reading the job description - this seems like a bit of a beat-up.
Breaking news: An employee has a stoush with HR.