Whats the context here?If a commentator confesses to not knowing the laws of the game, it should result in an instant season ban.
It's a shame, I quite look Hoops, but the fact that he doesn't know DuPont's law is ridiculous. There is no mitigation available for this offense. Off you go?
When Gordon was penalized for not retreating in this Argentina test match, Hooper told us he didn't know what the current law was.Whats the context here?
Possibly I'm misunderstanding your inference, but it'd be a pretty big call from Stan to pull out of sport imo.Pretty signficant news on the broadcast front; Nine CEO Mike Sneesby has stood down from his role after 12 months of pretty strong criticism.
Why is it relevant? Mike Sneesby was the boss of Stan and pivotal in the establishment of Stan Sport and signing up Rugby as a foundation content provider before promotion to CEO of Nine.
This photo below was taken at the time the broadcast agreement between Nine and RA was signed: you have Hugh Marks(Nine CEO), Rob Clarke(RA CEO) and Mike Sneesby (Stan CEO) all of whom have moved on now.
Possibly I'm misunderstanding your inference, but it'd be a pretty big call from Stan to pull out of sport imo.
Obviously I'm not sure of the numbers, but I can't imagine they're losing money on it - particularly after the Olympics. Given what's going on with Foxtel at the moment, you'd think Stan would be looking for opportunities to improve their sports offerings, not decrease them.
Oddly enough that plateau may also help us, if it pushes Stan to offer a cheaper, ad supported subscription, the way a few others have been. It would (hopefully) get more subscribers with access to our games and should increase the value of 'event tv' on the platform. Not sure if that's more or less likely with Sneesby moving on though.Not so much inference, just highlighting a significant shift in the political influence within Nine itself, which may impact the strategic direction of the company. Stan & Stan Sport essentially catapulted Mke Sneesby into the Nine CEO role, so he might have been a bit more protective/invested in ensuring it succeeds, whereas any new CEO could be open to a strategic shift in direction, noting the SVOD space is evolving so quickly, and Stans growth has plateaued.
Where did that graphic go? I came back to comment about Jeff Bezos needing to focus on business rather than flying spaceships around, but it's gone now. @Wilson the graphic showed that Stan is one of the few streaming platforms exhibiting positive growth over the last year, along with Kayo, Paramount+ and I think AppleTV. Amazon Prime, Netflix and Binge were the big losers.Get fucked Binge lmao.
The YouTube premium dropoff is interesting. If that's replicated elsewhere you can see why Google is looking to make AdBlockers formally against TOS for their Chrome suite.
Sorry - I realised I'd made an error in the postWhere did that graphic go? I came back to comment about Jeff Bezos needing to focus on business rather than flying spaceships around, but it's gone now.
Kayo is a bit different to Stan in that respect though - they're (and were already) entirely sport and we are relatively small fry there, where as Stan shifting into ad-supported would potentially see sport become a greater focus of their business model.Our next deal is most likely going to involve us re-signing with 9/Stan I feel - even with a bit of change at the adult table. I genuinely don't see many other options for us that either we would want or want us.
Completely agree @Wilson re ad-supported models - although Kayo have that and still reckon $35/m is a good deal...
Stan revenue, with paying subscribers at 2.3 million, was up 5% to $447.7 million
Martin Kugeler, Stan’s chief executive officer, said: “Australia’s response to our groundbreaking Olympic viewing experience has exceeded all our expectations. With the most comprehensive offering in Australia’s Olympic history, we achieved a record breaking Stan Sport subscriber growth of over 50% – surpassing forecasts, making the Olympics a great success for Stan.