Lee Grant
John Eales (66)
Ruggo said:Reds may need to go back to the Saders game plan for a looksy. It will be based on combating a well organized team which is the problem we have got here.
That's good thinking.
One of the keys will be to deny the Stormers the ball, or their fair share of it. That's what the Reds did against the Crusaders. IIRR I advocated the same thing a week ago for the Bulls game, and it worked: Matfield said he was frustrated that his team couldn't get enough ball for the first hour. In both games the Reds got 60% ball and you know what?: the Force was close to that mark when they smacked the Stormers.
Having the ball more than the other mob doesn't guarantee a win as opponents who seize chances can turn all kinds of stats on their head. But a team will usually win more games with 60% possession than with 50% or 40%.
If you have the same amount of ball as the other lot have, plus half as much again, you can impose your game on them. They are so busy dealing with what you are doing that they don't get the time to put their stamp on the match.
If you run with the ball more instead of kicking it out you are going to have more possession because they will likely do more kicking than you do. And when the Reds do kick the pill it should be as they did against the Bulls: don't kick it out unless they have to. Don't give the Stormers the attacking platform from a set piece they crave, using their brilliant giraffe, Bekker. Don't let them play paint by numbers rugby. Make the game strange for them: give them helter skelter and see how they like it.
As part of the possession imperative the Reds can't turn the ball over 27 times as they did against the Bulls. It is always dangerous trying to use the ball in traffic around contact time, especially when forwards are involved. The Reds create a lot of chances doing so because going to ground with the pill instead allows good seconds for defenders to realign, but the Reds pigs should cool it a bit.
Another thing I have noticed the Reds doing wrongly is going to ground with their heads facing north too much; towards the opponents goal line. If the ball is spilt then it is more likely to be a knock forward. If the players fall east-west in the tackle the ball is not knocked on so often. And if they fall east-west so they are between opponents and the presented ball, it needs a lot of skill and good timing for opponents to fetch it. North-south tackled players are easier meat.
A team that is having a go will always get caught more in north-south tackles but nevertheless the Reds get in too many of them.
As for the problem of the Stormers good defence: they haven't played the Reds yet - and the Queenslanders had scored the 2nd most amount of tries at the end of Week 9. If the Reds keep to their open style of play, but with fewer turnovers, they should compromise the Stormers when realigning their defences as they are normally allowed to do.