Inside Shoulder
Nathan Sharpe (72)
Yes, quite.Not the way I see it
I really don't think there is a value in trying to link these as cause and affect as the wording may suggest
Aus school boys is a snap shot of players that can best deliver the coachs/selectors plan in a given year
1 in 8 if you are an Aus School Boy
1 in 200 a generous estimate if you are not
will make it to the Wallabies
of that 1 in 200 are players that
As Discussed School Boys are selected (or not selected) from a small window of not fully developed young men that have not been in total charge of their own destiny or other life pressures
- may have made it but were injured in the 2 month window at the end of a fooball season (from post here that could be anything up to 5 players)
- players that have not fully developed or
- have a skill set or game style that is not required at u19 levels and more useful at seniors
- excluded because of political expediencies
More significant bone, muscle and brain development will be continuing for the next 5-7 years for many of the less then 18 year olds qualifying for any year
athletic ability, co-ordination and attitude does not disappear because someone was or was not selected or because they turn 20
there are so many qualifications for any such study a single 10 second grab is not possible
The bet I should place is that confronted with a random wallaby it is more probable than not that he was not in oz schools.