I still don't see too many changes from the first two Bledisloe Tests. I think the decision will be that we were beaten by a really good team and there will still be faith in most of the players.
Obviously that will change if we get beaten by South Africa and Argentina but at this stage I'd say the mindset will be that these guys beat Wales, weren't good enough to beat New Zealand but we still consider them our best players that can beat the Springboks and Pumas.
If the Rugby Championship had been in the opposite order and we'd won our first four tests and then lost twice to New Zealand, I doubt there'd be the same arguments about widespread changes and ditching a whole bunch of players.
I think Beale will remain on the bench and someone will be blooded on the wing, but I fully expect 10-13 to remain Cooper, Barnes, Horne.
Assuming we have a 4-3 bench split again, Shipperley or Cummins will play on the wing and Tapuai or Cummins will be on the bench. If Shipperley doesn't start on the wing, he won't be in the 22.
Obviously that will change if we get beaten by South Africa and Argentina but at this stage I'd say the mindset will be that these guys beat Wales, weren't good enough to beat New Zealand but we still consider them our best players that can beat the Springboks and Pumas.
If the Rugby Championship had been in the opposite order and we'd won our first four tests and then lost twice to New Zealand, I doubt there'd be the same arguments about widespread changes and ditching a whole bunch of players.
I think Beale will remain on the bench and someone will be blooded on the wing, but I fully expect 10-13 to remain Cooper, Barnes, Horne.
Assuming we have a 4-3 bench split again, Shipperley or Cummins will play on the wing and Tapuai or Cummins will be on the bench. If Shipperley doesn't start on the wing, he won't be in the 22.