Search results

nup, only changes for injury

true, but his technique was not effective enough, the guy got up too quickly, being lower, some clearer evidence of arms and better body position ensure that the scragger thinks twice in the future

Nah, just to improve his technique, he needs to cleanout harder if anything, just legally

nah, it's a principality ;)

As a rampaging, running 6 - maybe. Sticking with a good openside and a tall backrower and it could be a formidable backrow But he ain't a 12, Bath worked that out

Yeah, Phipps needed a chill pill, he was trying to push the pace when it wasn't necessary But I am still baffled by that second pass it seemed to go through half the team with everyone calling "yours"

They may have the right to an opinion, but doesn't mean I have to respect that opinion

If we lose we don't deserve to make the quarters, bonus point, shmonus point It is about winning or going home

The biggest concern with that article is that is is written by Chris Rattue. He is invariably wrong about everything

I thought that was what the article said, Horwill ended up behind Simmons & Mumm as the one of the two selected "lineout/jumping locks", he wasn't being considered for the role filled by Douglas, Skelton and now Carter If Simmons or Mumm go down, I expect Horwill to be called in to the squad

Yesterday

Poite rewards dominance at scrum time, that is why we have been treated poorly (but fairly) in the past. How we go in this game, hopefully better, but how much better? I really have no idea.

As I said before (and it appears Cheika confirmed this at selection) Carter has been selected for a different role

We still need three proper lineout options against any of the decent sides Typos by SwiftKey, errors in tone by me

I think the workrate they want is about cleanouts and pushing and stuff; and as it is with Douglas, that stuff isn't appreciated enough My impression is that Horwill is being considered in the pecking order behind Symonds & Mumm as the "mobile lineout unit"

yeah, well, moving on

yes, that "source" has been somewhat downgraded

I hope they give Jim Stewart plenty of time at 13, he looks the business 15 Folau 14 Guildford 13 Stewart 12 Beale 11 Horne 10 Foley 9 Phipps I am more concerned with Foley honestly, 12 month rugby screws players. And if he goes down, do they go for Beale or Horwitz?

Yeah plenty of soccer players don't initially get visas as well. There is some criteria about % of internationals played in the last year as well

The Match Day Rugby T-Shirt would be a reasonable compromise