Search results

First public crucifixion, you have to justify why you think Hooper, DHP and Simmons played better than the blokes who actually played. Votes don’t count unless you do.

Maybe later this week (say Wed-Fri), so as not to confuse things, we can have a vote on the first 4 rounds. Don’t do it now though!

Ok so thinking about this, here’s what I propose: pick 1-23 but I’ll only record a point for each player in their respective 1-15 jersey. So for example if you think Hooper and Wright both had blinders and pick Hooper at 6, he will only get that point recorded for the 6 jersey, it won’t count...

OK, for the purpose of this exercise should I give everyone in the 23 one point, or the players in the 15 one point and the bench half a point? And I need a cut off time. Tues night for Wednesday circulation?

It would be a great initiative to then post a 'GAGR team of the round' based on the teams selected. And then a "GAGR Wallabies 23" at the end of it all. I don't mind being the stats master for now, once we get to September I get a bit busy though.

1. If its a team of the round then no. 2. Sure as long as it makes sense. E.g. picking an 8 at 6, 10 at 12, etc.

If we went domestic it would likely mean at least one more NSW and Qld team. I tend to think that a lot of players would gravitate towards their origins if that happened.

True. Put To'omua at 12, Kuridrani at 13, and DHP at 15 if fit to start with though. Probably Petaia on the wing over Daugunu. Bring him, Simone, Banks/Maddocks and one or both of the young 10's into the fold off the bench v the ABs.

Welcome, might need to brush up your spelling there old mate. And learn McDermott's first name. You might trot that backline out, I don't think too many other people would though. Just to clarify I've put the numbers in front of the names to check you meant it like you wrote it. I assume...

I'm with you two. I get that he's recovering from a foot injury and that's a bit of a shit for him but unless he actually gets over it and finds some prior form he won't be seeing much time in gold. No he hasn't done anything wrong but he has been far from inspiring too. As was discussed last...

I decided I'm not going to let the reaction to a throw away comment get in the way of my enjoyment of this forum. I'm just going to address the below and then move on from it, it's not really relevant to this thread anyway. It wasn't intended as a sexist comment and I apologise to those who...

Oh for fucks sake. If you lot are going to pull the sexist tag on me for saying it didn’t work for me then I’m out of here. Later.

I like the role you are talking about for Lou. I really like her and i’m not suggesting a woman can’t add as much if more more insight as the blokes to the commentary. What I was saying was having a female as the actual commentator during game play didn’t work for me. It might for others...

If anyone still backs the theory that SRNZ is god’s gift to rugby then watch the CRU v CHI game just winding up. More errors than my kids science exam and appalling reffing. While I’m at it, I have no problem with chics covering rugby in the media, in fact I like it. Actually being the...

That is the poorest call I have ever seen. Fuck the replay, he dropped it cold, and forward.

I like it but I reckon WA would get the lead role - WANTSAR

It was the temperature not so much the time of day. But yes if it's cold and moist (dewy) the air is thicker.

Looks like a major shake up happening at RA, HM has got his own version of Chainsaw in to strip out $15m in cost savings. Also looking at an AFL Commission type set up.

That's an interesting one. The inference would be that they are still working on him with a view to giving him some game time.

Justin Harrison mustn't be in the loop for these talks.