Search results

Millner is a hoodoo ground for the Marlins.

Kerevi is a bit of a one trick pony, the top international sides won't have much trouble containing him. If he were still here, he might be a good bench option, could create some chances when the game opens up towards the end. But if it means giving away one of the two spots, I would vote for...

In a world where locks are the most prized of all the positions, who cares about the past? What counts is, what is the best decision today. The only caveat would be that we simply must retain the best of our good young prospects.

14 days quarantine.

The Reds backrow, I reckon, should win it.

SOO did not work in the AFL, simply because there is, and can only be, one SOO by definition. The concept is taken. It was not planned to be as big as it has become, and that is the point we need to remember. Our version, such as it is, will only work as an exhibition game - a display of...

It will be worth it in the end - stay strong and keep safe.

There are too many opportunities in the NRL in the Sydney area for our code to be able to compete for the best. Plus they can sign kids up at an earlier age than we can.

How?

I'd go with the Reds, actually.

Good. He can go and coach Lebanon.

Copy the Poms. Play the perfect game, no mistakes, fantastic defence, get into their faces and don't take a backward step. 15 on 15. They are mortal.

The Manly fullback looked as though he belongs in the front row.

Whitelock's not too shabby. Their front row stocks are scary.

Not a bad squad.

I am thinking about the ball in hand stuff, like that 30 metre try in the RWC.

Not necessarily. There has to be a short-list, even if one or more of the names has no chance. It is a bureaucratic necessity.

They went all right, eh?

Go the Woodies!!!

Our record of converting leaguies to our game is poor. Maybe that is the issue? Plus, by definition, we would have to pay them more in our game than they can earn in their own code. Maybe that is another issue?